Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  GST registration cancellation without reasons amounts to ‘Economic Death’ of business: Supreme Court. *  No GST refund if appeal before GSTAT is filed late: Gujarat High Court. *  Mere upload of GST notice on portal not valid service, appeal limitation won’t start: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Taxpayer can’t be penalised for missing notices hidden under ‘Additional Notices/Orders’: Calcutta High Court allows fresh adjudication. *  State tax officer can’t issue GST SCN beyond CBIC-assigned jurisdiction: Bombay High Court stays recovery proceedings. *  Earlier 7.5% Pre-Deposit must count towards mandatory 10% for Appeal: Uttarakhand high court quashes CESTAT Order. *  Third Parties can’t challenge GST Advance Rulings merely due to financial impact: Karnataka HC *  GST SCN generated using AI tool quashed: Punjab & Haryana High Court *  Bank Attachment Quashed as Madras HC Quashes GST Order Issued Against Deceased Person *  ITC Blocking Order for Failure to Record ‘Reason to Believe’ U/R 86A Quashed: Allahabad High Court *  Govt Extends GSTAT Appeal Filing Deadline From 30 June to July 31, 2026 *  GST Demand on RWA Stayed: Allahabad High Court Questions Taxability of Electricity Distribution to Flat Owners *  CBIC Clarifies Jurisdiction After GST Registration Transfer: Earlier Proceedings Remain Valid, New Officer to Continue Action *  GST authorities’ certification not mandatory for reimbursement, but tax payment must be proven: Karnataka HC *  Contractor can’t seek gst reimbursement through writ when contract has arbitration clause: Karnataka HC *  Unsigned Order Is No Order in Law: AP HC Quashes GST Assessment Order for Want of Officer’s Signature *  Customs Can’t Levy Rs. 1.36 Crore Cost Recovery Charges Without Proof of Full-Day Officer Deployment: CESTAT  *  12% IGST Payable On Imported Dialysis Machine Parts: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Admits Challenge to GST Limitation Extension Notifications; Grants Protection Against Coercive Recovery *  Criminal Case Can’t Run Parallel to GST Proceedings on Same Facts: Allahabad High Court *  Allahabad High Court Stays GST Detention Order; Directs Release of Vehicle and Goods on Deposit of Rs. 1.44 Lakh *  Service Tax Can’t Be Levied on Loss-Making Contracts: Gujarat High Court *  GSTN Mandates Ship-to GSTIN in e-Invoice and e-Way Bill APIs; Introduces Voluntary e-Way Bill Closure Facility from August 1, 2026 *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred When Taxpayer Was Pursuing Rectification Remedy: Telangana High Court *  Absence of E-Way Bill and Transport Documents Justifies Customs Seizure U/s 110: Gauhati HC *  Madras High Court Upholds GST Late Fee and Penalty for Non-Filing of Annual Return, Dismisses Challenge  *  GST Records, Purchase Documents Sufficient to Discharge Burden Under Customs Act: CESTAT Orders Release of 3.65 Kg Gold  *  No Sugar Cess Payable on Sugar Exported Out of India: CESTAT *  Road Construction Services Exempt and SCN Time-Barred: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand Based Solely on Form 26AS  *  ITC Freeze Upheld After GST Dept Find Suppliers Were Allegedly Fake Bill-Trading Entities: Madras HC 
Subject News *  Input service benefits can’t be denied: CESTAT allows export refund despite MMTC acting as Canalising agency. *  No service tax demand without proof of service of SCN: CESTAT. *  Service tax demand quashed as dept. fails to prove service of SCN: CESTAT *  GST : Mere allegation of inadequate consideration of reply not enough to invoke writ jurisdiction: Delhi High Court *  Onerous conditions imposed for provisional release of seized imported goods shouldn’t amount to virtual denial of relief: CESTAT. *  GST SCN without alleging fraud cannot invoke sec. 74: Karnataka High Court quashes adjudication order. *  Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked Merely on Form 26AS Data: CESTAT *  Revenue-Sharing with Restaurants Not Taxable as Business Support Service: CESTAT *  R. 6(3) Option Can’t Be Forced on Taxpayer; CESTAT Quashes Rs. 12.36 Crore CENVAT Credit Demand *  Excise Duty | Power Consumption Alone Can’t Prove Clandestine Manufacture: Karnataka High Court *  Madras High Court Examines DGGI’s Authority to Issue GST Penalty Orders Under Section 122, Adds DGGI as Party *  Proceedings under omitted r. 96(10) can’t survive without saving clause: andhra pradesh high court quashes gst refund recovery *  Excise duty power consumption alone can’t prove clandestine manufacture: karnataka high court *  Madras high court rules GST show cause notices must disclose grounds for invoking extended limitation *  Court Can’t Direct Extension GST Return Deadlines or Waive Interest and Penalties: Karnataka High Court *  GST Notifications Can’t Go Beyond GST Council Recommendations: Madras High Court Quashes SCN on Branded Pulses *  Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed for Delay When Dept’s Own Order Mis-states Limitation Period: CESTAT *  No Evidence of KYC or Due Diligence Breach By Customs Broker: CESTAT Quashes Licence Revocation in Export Overvaluation Case *  Glucometers Are Chemical Analysis Instruments Classifiable Under Tariff Heading 9027: CESTAT *  Validity of Post-GST Service Tax Proceedings Upheld: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Challenge to S. 73 SCN *  Rectified GST Refund Applications Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred If Original Refund Claim Was Filed Within Limitation: Gujarat HC *  Service Tax Refund Can’t Be Denied as Time-Barred When Levy Itself Is Unconstitutional: Gujarat High Court *  Same Officer Can’t Act As Auditor & Adjudicator: Karnataka High Court *  Karnataka High Court Condones 324-Day Delay, Revives Customs Appeal in Jewellery Pilferage Case  *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Order Passed Ex Parte Despite Prior ITC Reversal; Lifts Bank Attachment *  Tobacco Process Doesn’t Amount to Manufacturing: Madras High Court Quashes Rs. 1.32 Crore Compensation Cess Demand  *  Recovery Notice Unsustainable After Voluntary Reversal of Unutilised Credit: CESTAT  *  GST | ‘System Generated’ SCN Without Officer Details Invalid: Allahabad HC  *  Electronic Records Without Statutory Certification Requirements Can’t Justify Undervaluation Allegations: CESTAT *  Madras High Court Stays GST Order, Finds Prima Facie Merit in Plea Against S. 74 Proceedings Based on S. 73 Intimation  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST Update No 155 on Circular regarding import of goods at concessional rate of duty

GST Update No 155 on Circular regarding import of goods at concessional rate of duty
With the advent and outbreak of Covid-19 pandemic in various parts of countries, concept of digitalization and complete automation has increased to a great extent. The Government is kind enough to issue circulars in this regard simplifying the procedures and providing relief to trade and industry. Recently, clarification was released by the CBIC vide Circular No 04/2022- Customs dated 27.02.2022 which talks about simple and contact less procedure on import of goods at concessional rate of duty (IGCR) Rules 2017 which are effective from 01.03.2022. The discussion of the circular is subject matter of our present update. The issues touched upon by the circular are discussed as follows:- 1) Issuance of Bond: First of all, in current offline system, the importer who intends to import at concessional rate of custom duty shall have to furnish bond with bank guarantee to the department. Now also, he has to follow the same procedure and has to follow the same procedure. As per circular, one-time continuity Bond shall be furnished in Part-B of IGCR-1 by the importer and a physical copy of the same along with bank guarantee is to be furnished to Custom officer. The bond is to be on the stamp paper as well as hard copy of the bank guarantee is essential, hence this bond and bank guarantee is to be submitted online. The officer shall then upon satisfied will accept the request on Customs Automated System and a bond number will then be generated. Moreover, additional bonds can also be executed and bank guarantee can be furnished. However, portal is new and teething problems will be there. We have seen the same in GST era also. Hence, time should be given to understand and start working on the portal. Meanwhile, both the existing offline system and updated online system should be operated simultaneously so that the importers as well as department does not face the problems. Furthermore, for the already operating assessee, all the bonds and bank guarantees should be feed by officers on the portal before 13.03.2022. But it seems to be difficult task as only one officer in the complete Commissionerate is appointed for this purpose. Earlier every jurisdictional division office was looking after this work. But now only one officer is Commissionerate will do this work. Calling and feeding of this information will be difficult task. Filing of online application: - One-time prior intimation on the common portal in Form IGCR-1 is to be filed by the importer. In earlier regime, consignment wise intimation was being filed with the jurisdictional officer but now only one time basis information is required to be filed. But there was provision of intimation only but now the acceptance of this is to be taken. It is not clear whether this acceptance will come from officer or the common portal automatically? But this permission from officer will delay the procedure and will add human intervention in online system. Further, upon accepting, a unique IGCR Identification Number (IIN) shall be generated which shall be made available to customs officer via common portal itself. But this permission is required only once. Thereafter, he can continue with the scheme thereafter and no consignment wise permission is required. 2) Import of Goods: The concerned importer shall furnish details of IIN and bond number along with Bill of Entry filed. The Customs Commissioner will then allow benefit of exemption notification. Upon filing bill of entry, the bond automatically gets debited in the Customs Automated System. It is clarified that these details shall be available to jurisdictional officer through common portal. Further, the transition provisions given in circular require that importer should give the details of stock bill of entry wise to the portal but the importer maintain the overall stock but bill of entry wise stock is not being maintained. Normally, they follow the FIFO method and presume that closing stock pertain to last bill of enteries. Even we are failed to understand the requirement of the same. This unnecessary requirement will put the importers under pressure and they have to maintain this record and file the same before 13.03.2022 after which portal will start working. 3) Receipt of Goods: It has been clarified that if goods are received directly in importer’s premises or at job-worker’s premises or partly at importer’s premises and partly at job-worker’s premises, the requirement of intimating the receipt has been done away with which is a positive move. Consequently, intimation is required only in case of any non-receipt or short receipt of goods on common portal in Form IGCR-2 based on IIN, invoice and bill of entry. This is a welcome step which doing away the unnecessary requirement of giving intimation on receipt of goods. (a) Goods sent directly on Job-worker’s premises: In such a scenario, importer shall send the goods along with e-way bill. Since, the requirement of intimating is done away with, now the importer shall maintain records and details in monthly statement. Further, the maximum period for which goods shall remain with job worker shall be 6 months from date of invoice or e-way bill. On the contrary, as per Section 143 of CGST Section 2017, the maximum period for which goods shall remain with job worker shall be 1 year in case of inputs and 3 years in case of capital goods. Furthermore, in GST no invoice is required to be prepared in case goods are sent to job worker’s premises which is a contradictory point as far as this circular is concerned. Instead, challan should be issued to send goods to job worker’s premises. Therefore, in to avoid any ambiguity and difference, the said circular should be amended and brought on the same lines as in GST Law. (b) Inter Unit transfer of goods: In case goods are sent to any other unit of same importer, the circular require that these goods shall be accompanied with invoice along with E-way bill mentioning the description and quality of goods. On the contrary, in case any other unit of the importer is in the same state under same registration, no invoice is required as per GST Act and only e-way bill is required. Normally, taxpayer issues delivery challan for the same. The above circular should be amended and issued in alignment of GST Act to avoid any discrepancies in the minds of importer and officers both. Hence, the requirement of issuance of invoice should be done away with. But when the different registration is taken for different units having separate address then invoice is issued. But this happen rarely. Normally, units are registered in the same registration number. However, when the different units of a taxpayer is in different state then they are treated as distinct person and as such the movement of goods take place under invoice and e-way bill then this requirement is perfect. Hence, it should be prescribed in circular that the movement of goods should take place as per GST rules and regulations. (c) Utilization of goods for intended purpose: It has been clarified the importer shall use the imported goods on which exemption is availed within 6 months from date of import failing which importer shall have option either to re-export goods or clear for home consumption. (d) Re-export or clearance for home consumption: In case goods are re-exported, details shall be recorded in documents which shall be specified against bill of entry, invoice and item details of goods imported. Further, it is clarified that in case importer intends to clear un-utilized or defective goods on payment of duty and interest, import duty payable shall be difference between duty leviable and duty already paid along with interest u/s 28AA from the date of import to date of actual payment. The details of these shall be recorded by importer in monthly statement and duties along with interest and shall be paid using manual challan at the port. 4) Monthly statement and maintenance of account: The monthly statement shall be submitted by 10th day of following month in Form IGCR-3. However, the first monthly return shall be submitted in April 2022 which means that return for the month of March is to be filed online. In earlier regime, there was requirement of quarterly return but now it is to be filed monthly. Hence, it is increasing the compliance burden. The importer in respect of imported goods maintain an account in prescribed format which shall be produced to Jurisdictional Customs Officer as and when required. Moreover, one more prescribed statement is also to be maintained for inter unit movement of goods. Furthermore, job worker should also maintain records in prescribed format. But all these transactions are recorded in GST and as such this should be accepted rather than prescribing one more set of records for this purpose. This will increase the compliance burden of taxpayers. When the records of GST are accepted for movement of goods then the records should also be accepted. 5) Transitional Measures: Clarification is issued in respect of transition phase wherein it is clarified that in case goods imported under IGCR already exist in the premises of importer on date of transition option is provided to importer to record details of goods according to bill of entries, invoices etc. in monthly statement and linking the past bill of entries in the common portal. This will increase the compliance work of importers since earlier details of stock was maintained as per FIFO method as stated above. However, the circular has issued to link the details of quantity along with bill of entries. Consequently, increasing workload of the importers to a greater extend. Moreover, the importer shall have option to submit procurement certificates for import for availing benefit of the scheme till 13.03.2022. It is also clarified that currently the system as regards to EOUs claiming exemption of duties on imported goods is under development and hence, they can continue to follow manual process for the same. The afore-mentioned CBIC circular is a valuable initiative by the Government substantiating the motive of “Atmanirbhar Bharat” wherein continuous efforts are made towards creating an environment for promoting manufacturing by domestic industry to make them competitive globally in international markets. However, the officers should be directed to implement this new system with human face and try to resolve the problems of taxpayers.
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com