Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST Update No 155 on Circular regarding import of goods at concessional rate of duty

GST Update No 155 on Circular regarding import of goods at concessional rate of duty
With the advent and outbreak of Covid-19 pandemic in various parts of countries, concept of digitalization and complete automation has increased to a great extent. The Government is kind enough to issue circulars in this regard simplifying the procedures and providing relief to trade and industry. Recently, clarification was released by the CBIC vide Circular No 04/2022- Customs dated 27.02.2022 which talks about simple and contact less procedure on import of goods at concessional rate of duty (IGCR) Rules 2017 which are effective from 01.03.2022. The discussion of the circular is subject matter of our present update. The issues touched upon by the circular are discussed as follows:- 1) Issuance of Bond: First of all, in current offline system, the importer who intends to import at concessional rate of custom duty shall have to furnish bond with bank guarantee to the department. Now also, he has to follow the same procedure and has to follow the same procedure. As per circular, one-time continuity Bond shall be furnished in Part-B of IGCR-1 by the importer and a physical copy of the same along with bank guarantee is to be furnished to Custom officer. The bond is to be on the stamp paper as well as hard copy of the bank guarantee is essential, hence this bond and bank guarantee is to be submitted online. The officer shall then upon satisfied will accept the request on Customs Automated System and a bond number will then be generated. Moreover, additional bonds can also be executed and bank guarantee can be furnished. However, portal is new and teething problems will be there. We have seen the same in GST era also. Hence, time should be given to understand and start working on the portal. Meanwhile, both the existing offline system and updated online system should be operated simultaneously so that the importers as well as department does not face the problems. Furthermore, for the already operating assessee, all the bonds and bank guarantees should be feed by officers on the portal before 13.03.2022. But it seems to be difficult task as only one officer in the complete Commissionerate is appointed for this purpose. Earlier every jurisdictional division office was looking after this work. But now only one officer is Commissionerate will do this work. Calling and feeding of this information will be difficult task. Filing of online application: - One-time prior intimation on the common portal in Form IGCR-1 is to be filed by the importer. In earlier regime, consignment wise intimation was being filed with the jurisdictional officer but now only one time basis information is required to be filed. But there was provision of intimation only but now the acceptance of this is to be taken. It is not clear whether this acceptance will come from officer or the common portal automatically? But this permission from officer will delay the procedure and will add human intervention in online system. Further, upon accepting, a unique IGCR Identification Number (IIN) shall be generated which shall be made available to customs officer via common portal itself. But this permission is required only once. Thereafter, he can continue with the scheme thereafter and no consignment wise permission is required. 2) Import of Goods: The concerned importer shall furnish details of IIN and bond number along with Bill of Entry filed. The Customs Commissioner will then allow benefit of exemption notification. Upon filing bill of entry, the bond automatically gets debited in the Customs Automated System. It is clarified that these details shall be available to jurisdictional officer through common portal. Further, the transition provisions given in circular require that importer should give the details of stock bill of entry wise to the portal but the importer maintain the overall stock but bill of entry wise stock is not being maintained. Normally, they follow the FIFO method and presume that closing stock pertain to last bill of enteries. Even we are failed to understand the requirement of the same. This unnecessary requirement will put the importers under pressure and they have to maintain this record and file the same before 13.03.2022 after which portal will start working. 3) Receipt of Goods: It has been clarified that if goods are received directly in importer’s premises or at job-worker’s premises or partly at importer’s premises and partly at job-worker’s premises, the requirement of intimating the receipt has been done away with which is a positive move. Consequently, intimation is required only in case of any non-receipt or short receipt of goods on common portal in Form IGCR-2 based on IIN, invoice and bill of entry. This is a welcome step which doing away the unnecessary requirement of giving intimation on receipt of goods. (a) Goods sent directly on Job-worker’s premises: In such a scenario, importer shall send the goods along with e-way bill. Since, the requirement of intimating is done away with, now the importer shall maintain records and details in monthly statement. Further, the maximum period for which goods shall remain with job worker shall be 6 months from date of invoice or e-way bill. On the contrary, as per Section 143 of CGST Section 2017, the maximum period for which goods shall remain with job worker shall be 1 year in case of inputs and 3 years in case of capital goods. Furthermore, in GST no invoice is required to be prepared in case goods are sent to job worker’s premises which is a contradictory point as far as this circular is concerned. Instead, challan should be issued to send goods to job worker’s premises. Therefore, in to avoid any ambiguity and difference, the said circular should be amended and brought on the same lines as in GST Law. (b) Inter Unit transfer of goods: In case goods are sent to any other unit of same importer, the circular require that these goods shall be accompanied with invoice along with E-way bill mentioning the description and quality of goods. On the contrary, in case any other unit of the importer is in the same state under same registration, no invoice is required as per GST Act and only e-way bill is required. Normally, taxpayer issues delivery challan for the same. The above circular should be amended and issued in alignment of GST Act to avoid any discrepancies in the minds of importer and officers both. Hence, the requirement of issuance of invoice should be done away with. But when the different registration is taken for different units having separate address then invoice is issued. But this happen rarely. Normally, units are registered in the same registration number. However, when the different units of a taxpayer is in different state then they are treated as distinct person and as such the movement of goods take place under invoice and e-way bill then this requirement is perfect. Hence, it should be prescribed in circular that the movement of goods should take place as per GST rules and regulations. (c) Utilization of goods for intended purpose: It has been clarified the importer shall use the imported goods on which exemption is availed within 6 months from date of import failing which importer shall have option either to re-export goods or clear for home consumption. (d) Re-export or clearance for home consumption: In case goods are re-exported, details shall be recorded in documents which shall be specified against bill of entry, invoice and item details of goods imported. Further, it is clarified that in case importer intends to clear un-utilized or defective goods on payment of duty and interest, import duty payable shall be difference between duty leviable and duty already paid along with interest u/s 28AA from the date of import to date of actual payment. The details of these shall be recorded by importer in monthly statement and duties along with interest and shall be paid using manual challan at the port. 4) Monthly statement and maintenance of account: The monthly statement shall be submitted by 10th day of following month in Form IGCR-3. However, the first monthly return shall be submitted in April 2022 which means that return for the month of March is to be filed online. In earlier regime, there was requirement of quarterly return but now it is to be filed monthly. Hence, it is increasing the compliance burden. The importer in respect of imported goods maintain an account in prescribed format which shall be produced to Jurisdictional Customs Officer as and when required. Moreover, one more prescribed statement is also to be maintained for inter unit movement of goods. Furthermore, job worker should also maintain records in prescribed format. But all these transactions are recorded in GST and as such this should be accepted rather than prescribing one more set of records for this purpose. This will increase the compliance burden of taxpayers. When the records of GST are accepted for movement of goods then the records should also be accepted. 5) Transitional Measures: Clarification is issued in respect of transition phase wherein it is clarified that in case goods imported under IGCR already exist in the premises of importer on date of transition option is provided to importer to record details of goods according to bill of entries, invoices etc. in monthly statement and linking the past bill of entries in the common portal. This will increase the compliance work of importers since earlier details of stock was maintained as per FIFO method as stated above. However, the circular has issued to link the details of quantity along with bill of entries. Consequently, increasing workload of the importers to a greater extend. Moreover, the importer shall have option to submit procurement certificates for import for availing benefit of the scheme till 13.03.2022. It is also clarified that currently the system as regards to EOUs claiming exemption of duties on imported goods is under development and hence, they can continue to follow manual process for the same. The afore-mentioned CBIC circular is a valuable initiative by the Government substantiating the motive of “Atmanirbhar Bharat” wherein continuous efforts are made towards creating an environment for promoting manufacturing by domestic industry to make them competitive globally in international markets. However, the officers should be directed to implement this new system with human face and try to resolve the problems of taxpayers.
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com