Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST Update No 155 on Circular regarding import of goods at concessional rate of duty

GST Update No 155 on Circular regarding import of goods at concessional rate of duty
With the advent and outbreak of Covid-19 pandemic in various parts of countries, concept of digitalization and complete automation has increased to a great extent. The Government is kind enough to issue circulars in this regard simplifying the procedures and providing relief to trade and industry. Recently, clarification was released by the CBIC vide Circular No 04/2022- Customs dated 27.02.2022 which talks about simple and contact less procedure on import of goods at concessional rate of duty (IGCR) Rules 2017 which are effective from 01.03.2022. The discussion of the circular is subject matter of our present update. The issues touched upon by the circular are discussed as follows:- 1) Issuance of Bond: First of all, in current offline system, the importer who intends to import at concessional rate of custom duty shall have to furnish bond with bank guarantee to the department. Now also, he has to follow the same procedure and has to follow the same procedure. As per circular, one-time continuity Bond shall be furnished in Part-B of IGCR-1 by the importer and a physical copy of the same along with bank guarantee is to be furnished to Custom officer. The bond is to be on the stamp paper as well as hard copy of the bank guarantee is essential, hence this bond and bank guarantee is to be submitted online. The officer shall then upon satisfied will accept the request on Customs Automated System and a bond number will then be generated. Moreover, additional bonds can also be executed and bank guarantee can be furnished. However, portal is new and teething problems will be there. We have seen the same in GST era also. Hence, time should be given to understand and start working on the portal. Meanwhile, both the existing offline system and updated online system should be operated simultaneously so that the importers as well as department does not face the problems. Furthermore, for the already operating assessee, all the bonds and bank guarantees should be feed by officers on the portal before 13.03.2022. But it seems to be difficult task as only one officer in the complete Commissionerate is appointed for this purpose. Earlier every jurisdictional division office was looking after this work. But now only one officer is Commissionerate will do this work. Calling and feeding of this information will be difficult task. Filing of online application: - One-time prior intimation on the common portal in Form IGCR-1 is to be filed by the importer. In earlier regime, consignment wise intimation was being filed with the jurisdictional officer but now only one time basis information is required to be filed. But there was provision of intimation only but now the acceptance of this is to be taken. It is not clear whether this acceptance will come from officer or the common portal automatically? But this permission from officer will delay the procedure and will add human intervention in online system. Further, upon accepting, a unique IGCR Identification Number (IIN) shall be generated which shall be made available to customs officer via common portal itself. But this permission is required only once. Thereafter, he can continue with the scheme thereafter and no consignment wise permission is required. 2) Import of Goods: The concerned importer shall furnish details of IIN and bond number along with Bill of Entry filed. The Customs Commissioner will then allow benefit of exemption notification. Upon filing bill of entry, the bond automatically gets debited in the Customs Automated System. It is clarified that these details shall be available to jurisdictional officer through common portal. Further, the transition provisions given in circular require that importer should give the details of stock bill of entry wise to the portal but the importer maintain the overall stock but bill of entry wise stock is not being maintained. Normally, they follow the FIFO method and presume that closing stock pertain to last bill of enteries. Even we are failed to understand the requirement of the same. This unnecessary requirement will put the importers under pressure and they have to maintain this record and file the same before 13.03.2022 after which portal will start working. 3) Receipt of Goods: It has been clarified that if goods are received directly in importer’s premises or at job-worker’s premises or partly at importer’s premises and partly at job-worker’s premises, the requirement of intimating the receipt has been done away with which is a positive move. Consequently, intimation is required only in case of any non-receipt or short receipt of goods on common portal in Form IGCR-2 based on IIN, invoice and bill of entry. This is a welcome step which doing away the unnecessary requirement of giving intimation on receipt of goods. (a) Goods sent directly on Job-worker’s premises: In such a scenario, importer shall send the goods along with e-way bill. Since, the requirement of intimating is done away with, now the importer shall maintain records and details in monthly statement. Further, the maximum period for which goods shall remain with job worker shall be 6 months from date of invoice or e-way bill. On the contrary, as per Section 143 of CGST Section 2017, the maximum period for which goods shall remain with job worker shall be 1 year in case of inputs and 3 years in case of capital goods. Furthermore, in GST no invoice is required to be prepared in case goods are sent to job worker’s premises which is a contradictory point as far as this circular is concerned. Instead, challan should be issued to send goods to job worker’s premises. Therefore, in to avoid any ambiguity and difference, the said circular should be amended and brought on the same lines as in GST Law. (b) Inter Unit transfer of goods: In case goods are sent to any other unit of same importer, the circular require that these goods shall be accompanied with invoice along with E-way bill mentioning the description and quality of goods. On the contrary, in case any other unit of the importer is in the same state under same registration, no invoice is required as per GST Act and only e-way bill is required. Normally, taxpayer issues delivery challan for the same. The above circular should be amended and issued in alignment of GST Act to avoid any discrepancies in the minds of importer and officers both. Hence, the requirement of issuance of invoice should be done away with. But when the different registration is taken for different units having separate address then invoice is issued. But this happen rarely. Normally, units are registered in the same registration number. However, when the different units of a taxpayer is in different state then they are treated as distinct person and as such the movement of goods take place under invoice and e-way bill then this requirement is perfect. Hence, it should be prescribed in circular that the movement of goods should take place as per GST rules and regulations. (c) Utilization of goods for intended purpose: It has been clarified the importer shall use the imported goods on which exemption is availed within 6 months from date of import failing which importer shall have option either to re-export goods or clear for home consumption. (d) Re-export or clearance for home consumption: In case goods are re-exported, details shall be recorded in documents which shall be specified against bill of entry, invoice and item details of goods imported. Further, it is clarified that in case importer intends to clear un-utilized or defective goods on payment of duty and interest, import duty payable shall be difference between duty leviable and duty already paid along with interest u/s 28AA from the date of import to date of actual payment. The details of these shall be recorded by importer in monthly statement and duties along with interest and shall be paid using manual challan at the port. 4) Monthly statement and maintenance of account: The monthly statement shall be submitted by 10th day of following month in Form IGCR-3. However, the first monthly return shall be submitted in April 2022 which means that return for the month of March is to be filed online. In earlier regime, there was requirement of quarterly return but now it is to be filed monthly. Hence, it is increasing the compliance burden. The importer in respect of imported goods maintain an account in prescribed format which shall be produced to Jurisdictional Customs Officer as and when required. Moreover, one more prescribed statement is also to be maintained for inter unit movement of goods. Furthermore, job worker should also maintain records in prescribed format. But all these transactions are recorded in GST and as such this should be accepted rather than prescribing one more set of records for this purpose. This will increase the compliance burden of taxpayers. When the records of GST are accepted for movement of goods then the records should also be accepted. 5) Transitional Measures: Clarification is issued in respect of transition phase wherein it is clarified that in case goods imported under IGCR already exist in the premises of importer on date of transition option is provided to importer to record details of goods according to bill of entries, invoices etc. in monthly statement and linking the past bill of entries in the common portal. This will increase the compliance work of importers since earlier details of stock was maintained as per FIFO method as stated above. However, the circular has issued to link the details of quantity along with bill of entries. Consequently, increasing workload of the importers to a greater extend. Moreover, the importer shall have option to submit procurement certificates for import for availing benefit of the scheme till 13.03.2022. It is also clarified that currently the system as regards to EOUs claiming exemption of duties on imported goods is under development and hence, they can continue to follow manual process for the same. The afore-mentioned CBIC circular is a valuable initiative by the Government substantiating the motive of “Atmanirbhar Bharat” wherein continuous efforts are made towards creating an environment for promoting manufacturing by domestic industry to make them competitive globally in international markets. However, the officers should be directed to implement this new system with human face and try to resolve the problems of taxpayers.
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com