Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Missing seized records must be considered while testing ITC claim; duplicate GST demands ordered corrected: Delhi High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be rejected without addressing taxpayer’s grounds: Allahabad High Court. *  Surplus IGST credit can offset CGST, SGST shortfall: GSTAT. *  GST refund can’t be denied when cancelled airfares are returned with tax: GSTAT. *  3 Hearing notices issued within 2 minutes: Gujarat High Court flags portal flaw, seeks report. *  GSTR-9, GSTR-9C filing for FY 2025-26 enabled; pending GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B must be filed first. *  Dupattas are exempt fabrics, can’t be taxed as fibres at 4%: Madras High Court. *  Full transitional credit allowed on capital goods received after GST rollout: GSTAT denies Rs. 6.99 lakh export duty credit. *  GST return mismatch alone can’t justify fraud proceedings: GSTAT orders fresh adjudication under section 73. *  Supplier found non-existent later can’t alone justify input tax credit denial: GSTAT. *  GST interest stops once tax reaches government account, can’t run until return filing: GSTAT. *  Cancelled flat booking- GST refund can’t be denied without excluding COVID period from limitation: GSTAT. *  India notifies rules of origin for India–New Zealand FTA. *  Incomplete E-bike kits classifiable as complete vehicles, but not eligible for CKD duty concession: CESTAT. *  Same GST rate on main input and output can’t by itself bar inverted duty refund: GSTAT. *  Unjust enrichment doesn’t apply to customs refunds from assessments finalised before July 13, 2006: Gujarat High Court. *  CENVAT credit can’t be denied solely because plant And machinery are embedded in earth: Karnataka High Court. *  DFIA exports ineligible for RoDTEP benefits; customs directs repayment with applicable interest. *  Second E-Way bill alone doesn’t prove another supply: GSTAT. *  Bail denied in Rs. 1.19 crore fake GST refund case over risk of accused absconding again: Punjab and Haryana High Court. *  GST registration can be restored after revocation deadline if outstanding dues are paid: Gauhati High Court. *  Multiple GST proceedings over same suppliers: Calcutta High Court directs dept. to share findings for adjudication. *  E-Governance portal services not OIDAR, fixed deposit interest not taxable: CESTAT. *  Rs. 500 Stamp duty required on authority letters for CAs, CMA and GST practitioners in Pune GST division.  *  Rs. 1.10 crore GST refund must be paid in cash after business closure: Allahabad High Court. *  Godown rent attracts 18% GST even when used exclusively for exempt agricultural warehousing: AAR. *  GST portal launches "Multi-State Registration" facility: one master TRN for registration applications across multiple States/UTs. *  RoDTEP scheme extended till 31st December, 2026.  *  Mere disagreement with order can’t override Rs. 20 lakh appeal limit: GSTAT. *  Customs interest can’t be backdated before confiscation liability is determined; nearly 8 year period excluded: Delhi High Court.
Subject News *  GST summons: anticipatory bail maintainable without arrest order, but relief denied in evasion case: Allahabad High Court. *  GST Appeal can’t be decided without hearing taxpayer’s objections to fresh evidence: Allahabad High Court. *  GST ITC can’t be reversed merely because supplier grants discount without reducing tax liability: GSTAT. *  Mere quoting of GST provision is not a valid charge: GSTAT quashes ITC denial. *  Personal hearing mandatory before adverse GST order, even without taxpayer’s request: Rajasthan High Court. *  Parallel bail pleas without full disclosure amount to abuse of process Rs. 43.08 crore GST case sent for fresh hearing: Supreme Court. *  GST refund based on unchallenged advance ruling can’t be recovered using later circular: GSTAT. *  Payment of GST alone doesn’t end interest and penalty liability when tax and interest remain unpaid beyond 30 days of notice: GSTAT. *  GST demand over builders’ 80% procurement rule requires reasoned adjudication: GSTAT. *  Eligible ITC doesn’t automatically entitle taxpayers to compensation cess refund on domestic sales: GSTAT. *  GST confiscation order passed before reply deadline invalid: GSTAT. *  GST interest can’t be retained after tax refund on delayed export receipts: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be dismissed over pre-deposit shortfall without opportunity To respond: Bombay High Court. *  DGGI SCN can’t be challenged before reply and adjudication:Chhattisgarh High Court. *  GST input tax credit can’t be denied solely due to supplier’s retrospective registration cancellation: GSTAT. *  GST notice must explain fraud allegations; merely repeating section 74 Is not enough:  Himachal Pradesh High Court. *  Audit detection alone can’t justify GST fraud penalty; specific suppression must be proved: GSTAT. *  GST order uploaded only under ‘Additional Notices’ tab without separate intimation set aside: Calcutta High Court. *  Service Tax appeal can’t be rejected for missing pre-deposit proof when payment is already recorded: CESTAT. *  SGST dept. can’t hear appeal against CGST order: Calcutta High Court. *  Mere dispatch of tax order can’t prove service or make appeal time-barred: CESTAT. *  Dealer incentives can’t be taxed merely on ledger entries: CESTAT. *  DGFT orders quashed for failure to supply DRI letter relied upon in SCN: Bombay High Court. *  GST penalty u/s 122(1A) can’t apply to Pre-2021 transactions; unregistered beneficiaries also covered: Delhi High Court. *  Expired E-way bill caused by wrong PIN code can’t justify GST penalty without intent to evade tax: GSTAT. *  Used railway rails can’t be taxed as track material without proof they are fit for reuse: CESTAT. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand on different issue: Delhi High Court. *  ITC dispute involves no question of law: GSTAT directs appeal to Vice-President. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand On different issue: Delhi High Court. *  No E-way bill required for interstate goods movement in november 2017: GSTAT quashes detention and penalty.  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST Update No 152 on leviability of GST on Guest Lectures by professor

GST Update No 152 on leviability of GST on Guest Lectures by professor
The concept of Advance Ruling plays a vital role, particularly when there is confusion as regards the applicability of exemption notification to the assessee. At times, there is situation wherein goods/services appear to be covered under more than one exemption entry and there is confusion as regards the taxability of the said goods/services. Recently, the issue regarding leviability of GST on the guest lectures rendered by professor was raised before Karnataka AAR in the case of SRI SAIRAM GOPALKRISHNA BHAT. The analysis of this decision is subject matter of our present update. The applicant is a Professor of Law at National Law School of India University, Bengaluru and is engaged in classroom teaching of students. The applicant sought advance ruling as to whether the income earned for conducting Guest Lectures amounts to taxable supply of service. Further, whether income earned from research and training projects sponsored by the Ministry of Government is a taxable supply, taxed at NIL rate as per Heading 9992 or at 18% under Heading 9983. The applicant contended that the services provided by way of training is recreational activities related to art and culture and hence, exempt under Entry No. 80 of the notification no. 12/2017. The applicant further submitted that teaching and training under research program granted by Government of India is nature of pure services under Article 243G or 243W of the Constitution of India. Further, the said activities are covered under serial no. 72 of Notification No. 12/2017 since the entire expenditure is borne by Government and it stands exempted from tax bracket. The applicant also submitted MOU between Ministry of Environment and Centre of Environment Law Education in support of the contentions placed by them. Reliance was placed on the decision of Apex Court in the case of LOKA SHIKSHANA TRUST wherein it was held that ‘education’ was defined as a process of training and developing knowledge, skill and character of students by normal schooling. The AAR held that the services provided by the applicant as a guest lecturer is not covered under the list of exemption of educational activity since it is not known that the guest lecture is part of the curriculum designed by the educational institution. Further, the applicant is providing guest lectures on law and legal awareness and not on art and culture. Therefore, it shall not be covered under Entry No. 80 pertaining to recreational services. It was held that the services provided by the applicant in the capacity of guest lecturer shall be taxable at 18% GST as the same is covered under “other professional, technical and business services”. Moreover, it was stated that in order to claim exemption of Entry No 72, two conditions are required to be fulfilled i.e. training services to be provided only to Government and total expenditure is to borne by Government itself in this regard. Furthermore, it was held that there is no privity of contract between Ministry of Environment, Government of India and the applicant. Therefore, it was concluded that the above service shall stand taxable at the rate of 18%. The above decision is yet another example that reflects that the exemption notifications are to be interpreted in a strict manner as merely providing guest lectures to an educational institute would not entitle the lecturer for exemption unless and until it is established that the said lectures were part of the curriculum offered by the educational institute. However, GST liability may be avoided in this case if the guest lecturer is on the payroll of the educational institute and there exists employer/employee relationship between them but practically the guest lecturers are not employees of the educational institute. The efforts of the applicant to get the transaction covered under either of the exemption entries-3, or 72 or 80 of the notification no. 12/2017-Central Tax were in vain as the AAR concluded that the said services are liable to GST at the rate of 18%.
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com