Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST update No 143 on amended Section 16, 34 & 37 of the CGST Act, 2017

GST update No 143 on amended Section 16, 34 & 37 of the CGST Act, 2017
Several amendments have been proposed in the GST Law in the Finance Bill which is a part of Union Budget announced for 2022-23. Amendments have been made in the provisions regarding filing of returns, availment of input tax credit, GST refunds etc. Some of these amendments are in favour of taxpayers while some are revenue friendly. The present update seeks to discuss the changes made in Section 16, Section 34 and Section 37 of the CGST Act, 2017. Section 16 (2) is amended wherein a new clause (ba) is inserted. The said clause is related to availment of ITC with respect to a supply can be availed only if it is not restricted in the details communicated to the taxpayer under Section 38. According to this provision, the ITC with respect to an invoice is available only if the same is reflected in auto-generated statement such as GSTR-2B and is not ineligible for availment. For example- In case of accommodation services availed by a supplier in hotel situated outside State, the CGST and SGST of another State is being levied, which cannot be availed by the recipient. Consequently, it is provided that mere reflection of input tax credit in GSTR-2B would not suffice but the eligibility of credit is also to be taken care of. Furthermore, Section 16(4) of CGST Act, 2017 is also amended. This is done so that an extended time period can be allowed for availment of input tax credit by a registered person in respect of any invoice pertaining to the Financial Year upto 30th November of the following Financial Year. According to the present provision, the time limit for availing ITC is due date of furnishing return under section 39 for the month of September following the end of financial year to which such invoice or debit note pertains or furnishing of relevant annual return, whichever is earlier. The proposed amendment seeks to extend the due date of availment of ITC as 30th November of subsequent year for all the assessees. Through introduction of this amendment, the Government seeks to bring clarity and avoid unwanted litigations as regards the time limit for availment of input tax credit. This is for the reason that the time limit for taking credit is linked to due date of filing return which has been extended numerous times, earlier on account of initial stages of GST implementation and thereafter due to outbreak of pandemic which results in unwarranted disputes. Moreover, the issue was litigated even on the grounds that GSTR-3B is not a return for the purpose of computing time limit which was upheld by hon’ble Gujarat High Court in the case of AAP & Co. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA. However, the Apex Court has recently, reversed the judgment by concluding that GSTR-3B is return under section 39 of the CGST Act, 2017. The time limit is now fixed in absolute terms to bring clarity into the minds of the assessee as regards availment of input tax credit. It is pertinent to mention that further amendment is proposed under section 34(2) of CGST Act, 2017 wherein time limit for issuance of credit note has also been changed on similar lines. Now as per the new time limit, credit note can be issued upto 30th November of following financial year in respect of supplies made. Similarly, Section 37 of CGST Act, 2017 also stands amended to specify the time limit for rectification of errors in respect of details of outward supplies upto 30th November of subsequent financial year. The above changes indicate the initiatives taken by the government towards the motto of “easy and simple tax” as the complexities in the provisions have been simplified by making reference of fixed date of availment of credit, fixed time limit for issuance of credit note and making rectification of errors rather than using relative term of due date of filing the return for the September month following the financial year. This amendment also seeks to leave no room for doubt as regards claiming any benefit by the assessee on technical grounds such as GSTR-3B not to be considered as return under section 39 of the CGST Act, 2017. Although, the issue has been settled by the Apex Court in favour of the department that GSTR-3B is a return under section 39, the government appears to be extra cautious to avoid any unwarranted litigation in future.
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com