Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST update No 143 on amended Section 16, 34 & 37 of the CGST Act, 2017

GST update No 143 on amended Section 16, 34 & 37 of the CGST Act, 2017
Several amendments have been proposed in the GST Law in the Finance Bill which is a part of Union Budget announced for 2022-23. Amendments have been made in the provisions regarding filing of returns, availment of input tax credit, GST refunds etc. Some of these amendments are in favour of taxpayers while some are revenue friendly. The present update seeks to discuss the changes made in Section 16, Section 34 and Section 37 of the CGST Act, 2017. Section 16 (2) is amended wherein a new clause (ba) is inserted. The said clause is related to availment of ITC with respect to a supply can be availed only if it is not restricted in the details communicated to the taxpayer under Section 38. According to this provision, the ITC with respect to an invoice is available only if the same is reflected in auto-generated statement such as GSTR-2B and is not ineligible for availment. For example- In case of accommodation services availed by a supplier in hotel situated outside State, the CGST and SGST of another State is being levied, which cannot be availed by the recipient. Consequently, it is provided that mere reflection of input tax credit in GSTR-2B would not suffice but the eligibility of credit is also to be taken care of. Furthermore, Section 16(4) of CGST Act, 2017 is also amended. This is done so that an extended time period can be allowed for availment of input tax credit by a registered person in respect of any invoice pertaining to the Financial Year upto 30th November of the following Financial Year. According to the present provision, the time limit for availing ITC is due date of furnishing return under section 39 for the month of September following the end of financial year to which such invoice or debit note pertains or furnishing of relevant annual return, whichever is earlier. The proposed amendment seeks to extend the due date of availment of ITC as 30th November of subsequent year for all the assessees. Through introduction of this amendment, the Government seeks to bring clarity and avoid unwanted litigations as regards the time limit for availment of input tax credit. This is for the reason that the time limit for taking credit is linked to due date of filing return which has been extended numerous times, earlier on account of initial stages of GST implementation and thereafter due to outbreak of pandemic which results in unwarranted disputes. Moreover, the issue was litigated even on the grounds that GSTR-3B is not a return for the purpose of computing time limit which was upheld by hon’ble Gujarat High Court in the case of AAP & Co. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA. However, the Apex Court has recently, reversed the judgment by concluding that GSTR-3B is return under section 39 of the CGST Act, 2017. The time limit is now fixed in absolute terms to bring clarity into the minds of the assessee as regards availment of input tax credit. It is pertinent to mention that further amendment is proposed under section 34(2) of CGST Act, 2017 wherein time limit for issuance of credit note has also been changed on similar lines. Now as per the new time limit, credit note can be issued upto 30th November of following financial year in respect of supplies made. Similarly, Section 37 of CGST Act, 2017 also stands amended to specify the time limit for rectification of errors in respect of details of outward supplies upto 30th November of subsequent financial year. The above changes indicate the initiatives taken by the government towards the motto of “easy and simple tax” as the complexities in the provisions have been simplified by making reference of fixed date of availment of credit, fixed time limit for issuance of credit note and making rectification of errors rather than using relative term of due date of filing the return for the September month following the financial year. This amendment also seeks to leave no room for doubt as regards claiming any benefit by the assessee on technical grounds such as GSTR-3B not to be considered as return under section 39 of the CGST Act, 2017. Although, the issue has been settled by the Apex Court in favour of the department that GSTR-3B is a return under section 39, the government appears to be extra cautious to avoid any unwarranted litigation in future.
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com