Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  GST registration cancellation without reasons amounts to ‘Economic Death’ of business: Supreme Court. *  No GST refund if appeal before GSTAT is filed late: Gujarat High Court. *  Mere upload of GST notice on portal not valid service, appeal limitation won’t start: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Taxpayer can’t be penalised for missing notices hidden under ‘Additional Notices/Orders’: Calcutta High Court allows fresh adjudication. *  State tax officer can’t issue GST SCN beyond CBIC-assigned jurisdiction: Bombay High Court stays recovery proceedings. *  Earlier 7.5% Pre-Deposit must count towards mandatory 10% for Appeal: Uttarakhand high court quashes CESTAT Order. *  Third Parties can’t challenge GST Advance Rulings merely due to financial impact: Karnataka HC *  GST SCN generated using AI tool quashed: Punjab & Haryana High Court *  Bank Attachment Quashed as Madras HC Quashes GST Order Issued Against Deceased Person *  ITC Blocking Order for Failure to Record ‘Reason to Believe’ U/R 86A Quashed: Allahabad High Court *  Govt Extends GSTAT Appeal Filing Deadline From 30 June to July 31, 2026 *  GST Demand on RWA Stayed: Allahabad High Court Questions Taxability of Electricity Distribution to Flat Owners *  CBIC Clarifies Jurisdiction After GST Registration Transfer: Earlier Proceedings Remain Valid, New Officer to Continue Action *  GST authorities’ certification not mandatory for reimbursement, but tax payment must be proven: Karnataka HC *  Contractor can’t seek gst reimbursement through writ when contract has arbitration clause: Karnataka HC *  Unsigned Order Is No Order in Law: AP HC Quashes GST Assessment Order for Want of Officer’s Signature *  Customs Can’t Levy Rs. 1.36 Crore Cost Recovery Charges Without Proof of Full-Day Officer Deployment: CESTAT  *  12% IGST Payable On Imported Dialysis Machine Parts: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Admits Challenge to GST Limitation Extension Notifications; Grants Protection Against Coercive Recovery *  Criminal Case Can’t Run Parallel to GST Proceedings on Same Facts: Allahabad High Court *  Allahabad High Court Stays GST Detention Order; Directs Release of Vehicle and Goods on Deposit of Rs. 1.44 Lakh *  Service Tax Can’t Be Levied on Loss-Making Contracts: Gujarat High Court *  GSTN Mandates Ship-to GSTIN in e-Invoice and e-Way Bill APIs; Introduces Voluntary e-Way Bill Closure Facility from August 1, 2026 *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred When Taxpayer Was Pursuing Rectification Remedy: Telangana High Court *  Absence of E-Way Bill and Transport Documents Justifies Customs Seizure U/s 110: Gauhati HC *  Madras High Court Upholds GST Late Fee and Penalty for Non-Filing of Annual Return, Dismisses Challenge  *  GST Records, Purchase Documents Sufficient to Discharge Burden Under Customs Act: CESTAT Orders Release of 3.65 Kg Gold  *  No Sugar Cess Payable on Sugar Exported Out of India: CESTAT *  Road Construction Services Exempt and SCN Time-Barred: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand Based Solely on Form 26AS  *  ITC Freeze Upheld After GST Dept Find Suppliers Were Allegedly Fake Bill-Trading Entities: Madras HC 
Subject News *  Input service benefits can’t be denied: CESTAT allows export refund despite MMTC acting as Canalising agency. *  No service tax demand without proof of service of SCN: CESTAT. *  Service tax demand quashed as dept. fails to prove service of SCN: CESTAT *  GST : Mere allegation of inadequate consideration of reply not enough to invoke writ jurisdiction: Delhi High Court *  Onerous conditions imposed for provisional release of seized imported goods shouldn’t amount to virtual denial of relief: CESTAT. *  GST SCN without alleging fraud cannot invoke sec. 74: Karnataka High Court quashes adjudication order. *  Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked Merely on Form 26AS Data: CESTAT *  Revenue-Sharing with Restaurants Not Taxable as Business Support Service: CESTAT *  R. 6(3) Option Can’t Be Forced on Taxpayer; CESTAT Quashes Rs. 12.36 Crore CENVAT Credit Demand *  Excise Duty | Power Consumption Alone Can’t Prove Clandestine Manufacture: Karnataka High Court *  Madras High Court Examines DGGI’s Authority to Issue GST Penalty Orders Under Section 122, Adds DGGI as Party *  Proceedings under omitted r. 96(10) can’t survive without saving clause: andhra pradesh high court quashes gst refund recovery *  Excise duty power consumption alone can’t prove clandestine manufacture: karnataka high court *  Madras high court rules GST show cause notices must disclose grounds for invoking extended limitation *  Court Can’t Direct Extension GST Return Deadlines or Waive Interest and Penalties: Karnataka High Court *  GST Notifications Can’t Go Beyond GST Council Recommendations: Madras High Court Quashes SCN on Branded Pulses *  Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed for Delay When Dept’s Own Order Mis-states Limitation Period: CESTAT *  No Evidence of KYC or Due Diligence Breach By Customs Broker: CESTAT Quashes Licence Revocation in Export Overvaluation Case *  Glucometers Are Chemical Analysis Instruments Classifiable Under Tariff Heading 9027: CESTAT *  Validity of Post-GST Service Tax Proceedings Upheld: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Challenge to S. 73 SCN *  Rectified GST Refund Applications Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred If Original Refund Claim Was Filed Within Limitation: Gujarat HC *  Service Tax Refund Can’t Be Denied as Time-Barred When Levy Itself Is Unconstitutional: Gujarat High Court *  Same Officer Can’t Act As Auditor & Adjudicator: Karnataka High Court *  Karnataka High Court Condones 324-Day Delay, Revives Customs Appeal in Jewellery Pilferage Case  *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Order Passed Ex Parte Despite Prior ITC Reversal; Lifts Bank Attachment *  Tobacco Process Doesn’t Amount to Manufacturing: Madras High Court Quashes Rs. 1.32 Crore Compensation Cess Demand  *  Recovery Notice Unsustainable After Voluntary Reversal of Unutilised Credit: CESTAT  *  GST | ‘System Generated’ SCN Without Officer Details Invalid: Allahabad HC  *  Electronic Records Without Statutory Certification Requirements Can’t Justify Undervaluation Allegations: CESTAT *  Madras High Court Stays GST Order, Finds Prima Facie Merit in Plea Against S. 74 Proceedings Based on S. 73 Intimation  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST Update No 119 on Warranty claim and taxability of repair/maintenance

GST Update No 119 on Warranty claim and taxability of repair/maintenance
The concept of advance rulings has been introduced in the GST regime with a view to bring clarity as regards various issues that can be matter of confusion in the minds of assessee. After the advent of GST, thousands of advance rulings have been pronounced and most of the matters have been resolved. However, the interpretation of law is a continuous process and so rulings pronounced seeks to settle various doubts. Recently, advance ruling rendered in the case of M/s SOUTH INDIAN FEDERATION OF FISHERMEN SOCIEITES [ADVANCE RULING NO. KAR ADRG 74/2021 DATED 06.12.2021] discussed the GST leviability on free supplies made during warranty period and the taxability of repair and maintenance services provided with respect to fishing vessel. The reasoning adopted is the subject matter of discussion of our present update. The applicant is a Charitable Society engaged in undertaking various welfare activities for poor fisherman and providing them with necessary fishing requisites at concessional rates. The applicant sought advance ruling on following: ? Applicability of GST rate on marine engines and spares ? Levy of GST on supply made during warranty period ? Tax rate on puff insolated ice box used by fisherman for maintaining good hygiene ? Taxability of repair charges of supply of material and labour ? Tax rate on marine engine supplied to Defence Department. The Counsel of Department submitted following contentions with regard to questions sought: ? As far as applicable GST rate on Marine Engine and spare parts is concerned, 5% rate shall be applicable as per entry SI. No. 252 of Schedule I of Notification No. 01/2017 Central Tax dated 28.06.2017. ? Further, the department contended that in Sectorial FAQs by CBIC, it was clarified that no GST shall be chargeable on replacement if supply is made without consideration during warranty period. The value of supply already includes charges to be incurred during warranty period. Further, it was also clarified that supplier is notrequired to reverse the ITC on replaced parts. ? Further, the counsel of department contended that since puff insolated ice box falls under Customs Tariff Heading 3933, it shall attract GST @18% as provided in Schedule III of Notification No. 01/2017-Central Tax dated 28.09.2017. ? The revenue submitted that as far as collection of repair charges on supply of material and labour is concerned, if there is specifically provided in the contract and value of spare parts and services is separately charged in invoice, GST @5% shall be attracted i.e. the rate applicable to such spare parts and services. ? Further, as per Schedule I of Notification No. 01/2017- Central Tax dated 28.06.2017, in case any marine engine is supplied to Defence and other agencies for relief operations, GST shall be attracted at the rate of 5%. The AAR upheld the views of Counsel of Department. It was held that since replacement services were done without charging consideration, it does not fall in the ambit of supply u/s 7 of CGST Act, 2017 and hence, no GST shall be levied. Further, AAR clarified that in case of puff ice boxes used for good hygiene, GST at the rate 18% shall be charged because the product cannot be considered as a part of fishing vessel and hence, it shall not be eligible for concessional rate of GST. Moreover, AAR held that GST at the rate 18% shall be chargeable on collection of repair charges on supply of material and labour including supply of spare parts instead of 5%. The analogy taken by the AAR is that it is a composite supply wherein principal supply is supply of repair and maintenance since there is no transfer of goods in title. The issue regarding GST rate applicable on marine engine and spare parts was also raised in the case of “In re MAN Energy Solutions India Private Limited” wherein it was held that 5% GST shall be attracted. As regards taxability of goods supplied free of cost under warranty scheme is concerned, the issue is settled by clarification that as the original supply included the cost of warranty, no GST is payable on the free supplies made during warranty. However, with respect to repair and maintenance services, there may be divergent view as regards treating the said transaction as composite supply and applying the GST rate of 18%. In our opinion, if the value of spare parts are separately identifiable, the same should be liable to GST at their respective rates with the labour charges attracting GST rate of 18%.
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com