Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE No 112 ON CHANGES EFFECTIVE FROM 01.01.2022 IN CGST ACT, 2017

GST UPDATE No 112 ON CHANGES EFFECTIVE FROM 01.01.2022 IN CGST ACT, 2017
Since introduction of GST, there had been many twists and turns in the Act. The Government is taking all necessary steps to amend the provisions of law for better compliances. Recently, CBIC has notified the applicability of the provisions proposed in the Finance Act, 2021 as effective from 01.01.2022. The CBIC has issued Notification No. 39/2021-Central Tax dated 21.12.2021 for notifying the date of implementation of Sections 108, 109 and 113 to 122 of Finance Act, 2021 with effect from 1st January, 2022 which is the subject matter of discussion of our present update. The important amended provisions that are made applicable w.e.f. 01.01.2022 are discussed as follows: 1. Section 108 of Finance Act: A retrospective amendment is introduced in Section 7 of CGST Act, 2017 wherein entry no (aa) is proposed to be inserted which says that the activities or transactions provided by a person other than individual to its members for any valuable consideration shall be treated as supply. An explanation is added clarifying that members and the association shall be treated as different persons. Simultaneously, entry no 7 in Schedule II of CGST Act, 2017, is omitted retrospectively. The amendment is inserted on account of judicial pronouncements holding that no tax can be levied on the transactions undertaken between the club and its members owing to the principle of mutuality. This entry seeks to nullify the effect of the said decisions and confirms that activities provided by any person other than individual to its members for any valuable consideration will be considered as supply. 2. Section 109 of Finance Act: Section 16(2) of CGST Act, 2017 prescribes the conditions to be satisfied by an assessee for availing the input tax credit. Further, as per Rule 36(4) of CGST Rules, the assessee shall be eligible to take the provisional tax credit (without invoices being uploaded by the supplier in GSTR-1) in the GSTR-3B to the extent of 5% of eligible ITC reflected in the GSTR-2B. As of now, there was no legal statutory provision backing the provision restricting credit availment to the extent of 5% in the CGST Act, 2017. The government appears to have realised the lacunae in the law and has inserted section 16(2)(aa) of CGST Act, 2017 wherein it is stated that the assessee can claim credit only if the details of invoices or debit notes has been furnished by the supplier as outward supply and the details are communicated to the recipient in the manner as specified under Section 37 of CGST Act. This shall result in loss to the assessee because earlier assessee was able to avail 5% ITC on provisional basis but henceforth, ITC will be available only when invoice is furnished by supplier in GSTR-1. 3. Section 113 and 114 of Finance Act: As per section 74 of CGST Act, 2017, earlier, where proceedings against main person were concluded, proceedings against all other persons deemed to be concluded u/s 122, 125, 129 and 130 of CGST Act, 2017. However, the section 74 has been amended to deny the benefit of conclusion of proceedings to co-notice in cases where the provisions of Section 129 or 130 gets attracted. Furthermore, in Section 75 of CGST Act, 2017, an explanation has been inserted that the “self-assessed tax” shall include tax payable in respect of outward supplies furnished u/s 37 (GSTR-1) but not included in the return filed u/s 39 (GSTR-3B) of CGST Act, 2017. 4. Section 116 of Finance Act: Section 107 of CGST Act, 2017 deals with pre-deposit to be deposited with the Government in case the person is aggrieved by any decision or order passed under GST Act, 2017. In normal cases, the appellant is required to pre-deposit 10% of disputed tax liability in first appeal. However, amendment has been made to prescribe a mandatory predeposit of 25% of penalty in cases of detention and seizure of goods in transit. 5. Section 117 of Finance Act: Section 129 deals with detention, seizure and release of goods and conveyance in transit. There are numerous amendments in this Section. The provision contains sub clauses wherein penalty is segregated on the basis of who comes forward to release the goods detained. In clause (a) where the owner comes forward, in taxable goods, penalty equal to 200% of the tax payable and in exempted goods, penalty of 200% of value of goods or twentyfive thousand rupees, whichever is less shall be applicable. In clause (b), where owner does not come forward, penalty equal to 50% of the value of the goods or 200% of the tax payable on such goods, whichever is higher, while in case of exempted goods, 50% of the value of goods or twenty-five thousand rupees, whichever is less shall be applicable. Sub-section (3) has been substituted which says that the officer shall issue a notice within 7 days specifying the penalty and pass an order for payment of penalty within 7 days from date of service of notice. A proviso to sub-section (3) is clarified wherein the conveyance shall be released on payment of penalty as specified by the transporter or Rs. 1 lakh whichever is less. Certain other amendments are also notified which shall stand applicable from 01.01.2022. We have now completed 4 years after implementation of GST law but yet the process of refining the law is continued. The level of complexities is increasing with every passing day. It is hoped that the amendment made in section 16 of the CGST Act, 2017 requiring reflection of invoices by supplier in GSTR-1 for availment of credit by the recipient is re-visited as it leads to imposition of condition which is impossible to be complied by the recipient and tantamount to punishing recipient for the default of supplier.
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com