Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE No. 105 ON ANALYSIS OF ITC ADMISSIBILITY ON HIRING OF MOTOR VEHICLE

GST UPDATE No. 105 ON ANALYSIS OF ITC ADMISSIBILITY ON HIRING OF MOTOR VEHICLE
In our earlier update, we had discussed the favourable ruling pronounced by UP AAR in the case of DR WILLMAR SCHWABE (I) PRIVATE LIMITED wherein it was held that the ITC with respect to hiring of motor vehicles is available to the applicant. In the present update, we seek to discuss the detailed reasoning behind the favourable decision pronounced by the UP AAR in light of the amended provisions contained in section 17(5) of the CGST Act, 2017. In order to understand the interpretation of the provision, the relevant extracts are produced for the sake of convenient reference as follows:- (5) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1) of section 16 and sub- section (1) of section 18, input tax credit shall not be available in respect of the following, namely:— (a) motor vehicles for transportation of persons having approved seating capacity of not more than thirteen persons (including the driver), except when they are used for making the following taxable supplies, namely:— (A) further supply of such motor vehicles; or (B) transportation of passengers; or (C) imparting training on driving such motor vehicles; (ab) services of general insurance, servicing, repair and maintenance in so far as they relate to motor vehicles, vessels or aircraft referred to in clause (a) or clause (aa): Provided that the input tax credit in respect of such services shall be available— (i) where the motor vehicles, vessels or aircraft referred to in clause (a) or clause (aa) are used for the purposes specified therein; (ii) where received by a taxable person engaged— (I) in the manufacture of such motor vehicles, vessels or aircraft; or (II) in the supply of general insurance services in respect of such motor vehicles, vessels or aircraft insured by him; (b) the following supply of goods or services or both— (i) food and beverages, outdoor catering, beauty treatment, health services, cosmetic and plastic surgery, leasing, renting or hiring of motor vehicles, vessels or aircraft referred to in clause (a) or clause (aa) except when used for the purposes specified therein, life insurance and health insurance: Provided that the input tax credit in respect of such goods or services or both shall be available where an inward supply of such goods or services or both is used by a registered person for making an outward taxable supply of the same category of goods or services or both or as an element of a taxable composite or mixed supply; (ii) membership of a club, health and fitness centre; and (iii) travel benefits extended to employees on vacation such as leave or home travel concession: Provided that the input tax credit in respect of such goods or services or both shall be available, where it is obligatory for an employer to provide the same to its employees under any law for the time being in force. After reading the above provision, following points are worth noting:- 1. The restriction as regards availment of ITC on motor vehicles used for transportation of persons is only with respect to motor vehicles having approved seating capacity of 13 passengers with certain exceptions. Consequently, there is no restriction as regards availment of ITC on motor vehicles having approved seating capacity exceeding 13 persons. 2. Similarly, the restriction as regards availment of ITC on various services relating to motor vehicle such as of general insurance, servicing, repair and maintenance is also with respect to motor vehicles referred to in clause (a) being motor vehicles having approved seating capacity of 13 persons. Hence, there is no restriction in availment of such services in relation to motor vehicles having approved seating capacity exceeding 13 persons. However, with respect to motor vehicles having approved seating capacity of 13 persons, the ITC may be availed only if such motor vehicles are being used for specified purposes or such services are availed by general insurance service provider/manufacturer of such motor vehicle. 3. It is pertinent to mention that even the restriction of credit availment with respect to leasing, renting or hiring of motor vehicles is for motor vehicles having approved seating capacity of 13 persons as referred to in clause (a) and not for motor vehicles having approved seating capacity exceeding 13 persons. As such, there is no prohibition for availing input tax credit with respect to motor vehicle such as bus having approved seating capacity exceeding 13 persons, whether it be credit of purchase of bus or credit of various input services received as stated above. 4. There are two exceptions for availing the ITC of motor vehicles with approved seating capacity of 13 persons:- (i) If said services are used for providing an outward supply of same category of service. (ii) If said services are obligatory on part of employer to provide it for employees under any law for the time being in force. It is pertinent to mention here that as far as availability of credit under 4(i) is concerned, it is worth pointing out that the rate notification no. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 prescribing GST rate of 5% specifies condition that the ITC on goods or services used in supplying the service has not been taken. However, this condition is applicable for the service provider providing services of transportation of passengers. In case where the motor vehicle has been hired for the benefit of employees by the employer, no GST is payable by the employer on the recovery made from employees as the employer is not engaged in providing transportation of passenger service in usual course of business. Moreover, as per notification no. 29/2019-Central Tax dated 31.12.2019, services provided by way of renting of motor vehicle designed to carry passengers where cost of fuel is included in the consideration charged is liable to GST under reverse charge if the services are received by a body corporate. One may ponder as to whether the ITC would be available to the employer if tax is paid under reverse charge mechanism? The answer is in affirmative as restriction is only on the service provider providing transportation of passenger service and not to the recipient body corporate paying GST under reverse charge mechanism. As far as the admissibility of ITC under 4(ii) is concerned, it is worth mentioning that an adverse view was taken by Gujarat AAR in the case of M/s TATA MOTORS LTD. as far as admissibility of ITC on canteen facility provided to employees under mandate of the Factories Act, 1948. We had made an extensive analysis on the said decision in our earlier update wherein we disagreed with the reasoning adopted by the AAR wherein it was held that the exception carved out for the obligation under any Law is not applicable for outdoor catering services. Likewise, we are of the opinion that where the renting/hiring of motor vehicles is under statutory obligation of the employer, for example, Shops and Establishments Act requires compulsory transport facility to women working late night, the ITC is admissible even if the motor vehicle is having approved seating capacity of 13 persons. The above analysis seeks to answer all the possible doubts arising as regards admissibility of ITC on the services of hiring of motor vehicles availed by the assessee under GST Law.
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com