Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE No. 105 ON ANALYSIS OF ITC ADMISSIBILITY ON HIRING OF MOTOR VEHICLE

GST UPDATE No. 105 ON ANALYSIS OF ITC ADMISSIBILITY ON HIRING OF MOTOR VEHICLE
In our earlier update, we had discussed the favourable ruling pronounced by UP AAR in the case of DR WILLMAR SCHWABE (I) PRIVATE LIMITED wherein it was held that the ITC with respect to hiring of motor vehicles is available to the applicant. In the present update, we seek to discuss the detailed reasoning behind the favourable decision pronounced by the UP AAR in light of the amended provisions contained in section 17(5) of the CGST Act, 2017. In order to understand the interpretation of the provision, the relevant extracts are produced for the sake of convenient reference as follows:- (5) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1) of section 16 and sub- section (1) of section 18, input tax credit shall not be available in respect of the following, namely:— (a) motor vehicles for transportation of persons having approved seating capacity of not more than thirteen persons (including the driver), except when they are used for making the following taxable supplies, namely:— (A) further supply of such motor vehicles; or (B) transportation of passengers; or (C) imparting training on driving such motor vehicles; (ab) services of general insurance, servicing, repair and maintenance in so far as they relate to motor vehicles, vessels or aircraft referred to in clause (a) or clause (aa): Provided that the input tax credit in respect of such services shall be available— (i) where the motor vehicles, vessels or aircraft referred to in clause (a) or clause (aa) are used for the purposes specified therein; (ii) where received by a taxable person engaged— (I) in the manufacture of such motor vehicles, vessels or aircraft; or (II) in the supply of general insurance services in respect of such motor vehicles, vessels or aircraft insured by him; (b) the following supply of goods or services or both— (i) food and beverages, outdoor catering, beauty treatment, health services, cosmetic and plastic surgery, leasing, renting or hiring of motor vehicles, vessels or aircraft referred to in clause (a) or clause (aa) except when used for the purposes specified therein, life insurance and health insurance: Provided that the input tax credit in respect of such goods or services or both shall be available where an inward supply of such goods or services or both is used by a registered person for making an outward taxable supply of the same category of goods or services or both or as an element of a taxable composite or mixed supply; (ii) membership of a club, health and fitness centre; and (iii) travel benefits extended to employees on vacation such as leave or home travel concession: Provided that the input tax credit in respect of such goods or services or both shall be available, where it is obligatory for an employer to provide the same to its employees under any law for the time being in force. After reading the above provision, following points are worth noting:- 1. The restriction as regards availment of ITC on motor vehicles used for transportation of persons is only with respect to motor vehicles having approved seating capacity of 13 passengers with certain exceptions. Consequently, there is no restriction as regards availment of ITC on motor vehicles having approved seating capacity exceeding 13 persons. 2. Similarly, the restriction as regards availment of ITC on various services relating to motor vehicle such as of general insurance, servicing, repair and maintenance is also with respect to motor vehicles referred to in clause (a) being motor vehicles having approved seating capacity of 13 persons. Hence, there is no restriction in availment of such services in relation to motor vehicles having approved seating capacity exceeding 13 persons. However, with respect to motor vehicles having approved seating capacity of 13 persons, the ITC may be availed only if such motor vehicles are being used for specified purposes or such services are availed by general insurance service provider/manufacturer of such motor vehicle. 3. It is pertinent to mention that even the restriction of credit availment with respect to leasing, renting or hiring of motor vehicles is for motor vehicles having approved seating capacity of 13 persons as referred to in clause (a) and not for motor vehicles having approved seating capacity exceeding 13 persons. As such, there is no prohibition for availing input tax credit with respect to motor vehicle such as bus having approved seating capacity exceeding 13 persons, whether it be credit of purchase of bus or credit of various input services received as stated above. 4. There are two exceptions for availing the ITC of motor vehicles with approved seating capacity of 13 persons:- (i) If said services are used for providing an outward supply of same category of service. (ii) If said services are obligatory on part of employer to provide it for employees under any law for the time being in force. It is pertinent to mention here that as far as availability of credit under 4(i) is concerned, it is worth pointing out that the rate notification no. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 prescribing GST rate of 5% specifies condition that the ITC on goods or services used in supplying the service has not been taken. However, this condition is applicable for the service provider providing services of transportation of passengers. In case where the motor vehicle has been hired for the benefit of employees by the employer, no GST is payable by the employer on the recovery made from employees as the employer is not engaged in providing transportation of passenger service in usual course of business. Moreover, as per notification no. 29/2019-Central Tax dated 31.12.2019, services provided by way of renting of motor vehicle designed to carry passengers where cost of fuel is included in the consideration charged is liable to GST under reverse charge if the services are received by a body corporate. One may ponder as to whether the ITC would be available to the employer if tax is paid under reverse charge mechanism? The answer is in affirmative as restriction is only on the service provider providing transportation of passenger service and not to the recipient body corporate paying GST under reverse charge mechanism. As far as the admissibility of ITC under 4(ii) is concerned, it is worth mentioning that an adverse view was taken by Gujarat AAR in the case of M/s TATA MOTORS LTD. as far as admissibility of ITC on canteen facility provided to employees under mandate of the Factories Act, 1948. We had made an extensive analysis on the said decision in our earlier update wherein we disagreed with the reasoning adopted by the AAR wherein it was held that the exception carved out for the obligation under any Law is not applicable for outdoor catering services. Likewise, we are of the opinion that where the renting/hiring of motor vehicles is under statutory obligation of the employer, for example, Shops and Establishments Act requires compulsory transport facility to women working late night, the ITC is admissible even if the motor vehicle is having approved seating capacity of 13 persons. The above analysis seeks to answer all the possible doubts arising as regards admissibility of ITC on the services of hiring of motor vehicles availed by the assessee under GST Law.
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com