Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  GST registration cancellation without reasons amounts to ‘Economic Death’ of business: Supreme Court. *  No GST refund if appeal before GSTAT is filed late: Gujarat High Court. *  Mere upload of GST notice on portal not valid service, appeal limitation won’t start: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Taxpayer can’t be penalised for missing notices hidden under ‘Additional Notices/Orders’: Calcutta High Court allows fresh adjudication. *  State tax officer can’t issue GST SCN beyond CBIC-assigned jurisdiction: Bombay High Court stays recovery proceedings. *  Earlier 7.5% Pre-Deposit must count towards mandatory 10% for Appeal: Uttarakhand high court quashes CESTAT Order. *  Third Parties can’t challenge GST Advance Rulings merely due to financial impact: Karnataka HC *  GST SCN generated using AI tool quashed: Punjab & Haryana High Court *  Bank Attachment Quashed as Madras HC Quashes GST Order Issued Against Deceased Person *  ITC Blocking Order for Failure to Record ‘Reason to Believe’ U/R 86A Quashed: Allahabad High Court *  Govt Extends GSTAT Appeal Filing Deadline From 30 June to July 31, 2026 *  GST Demand on RWA Stayed: Allahabad High Court Questions Taxability of Electricity Distribution to Flat Owners *  CBIC Clarifies Jurisdiction After GST Registration Transfer: Earlier Proceedings Remain Valid, New Officer to Continue Action *  GST authorities’ certification not mandatory for reimbursement, but tax payment must be proven: Karnataka HC *  Contractor can’t seek gst reimbursement through writ when contract has arbitration clause: Karnataka HC *  Unsigned Order Is No Order in Law: AP HC Quashes GST Assessment Order for Want of Officer’s Signature *  Customs Can’t Levy Rs. 1.36 Crore Cost Recovery Charges Without Proof of Full-Day Officer Deployment: CESTAT  *  12% IGST Payable On Imported Dialysis Machine Parts: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Admits Challenge to GST Limitation Extension Notifications; Grants Protection Against Coercive Recovery *  Criminal Case Can’t Run Parallel to GST Proceedings on Same Facts: Allahabad High Court *  Allahabad High Court Stays GST Detention Order; Directs Release of Vehicle and Goods on Deposit of Rs. 1.44 Lakh *  Service Tax Can’t Be Levied on Loss-Making Contracts: Gujarat High Court *  GSTN Mandates Ship-to GSTIN in e-Invoice and e-Way Bill APIs; Introduces Voluntary e-Way Bill Closure Facility from August 1, 2026 *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred When Taxpayer Was Pursuing Rectification Remedy: Telangana High Court *  Absence of E-Way Bill and Transport Documents Justifies Customs Seizure U/s 110: Gauhati HC *  Madras High Court Upholds GST Late Fee and Penalty for Non-Filing of Annual Return, Dismisses Challenge  *  GST Records, Purchase Documents Sufficient to Discharge Burden Under Customs Act: CESTAT Orders Release of 3.65 Kg Gold  *  No Sugar Cess Payable on Sugar Exported Out of India: CESTAT *  Road Construction Services Exempt and SCN Time-Barred: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand Based Solely on Form 26AS  *  ITC Freeze Upheld After GST Dept Find Suppliers Were Allegedly Fake Bill-Trading Entities: Madras HC 
Subject News *  Input service benefits can’t be denied: CESTAT allows export refund despite MMTC acting as Canalising agency. *  No service tax demand without proof of service of SCN: CESTAT. *  Service tax demand quashed as dept. fails to prove service of SCN: CESTAT *  GST : Mere allegation of inadequate consideration of reply not enough to invoke writ jurisdiction: Delhi High Court *  Onerous conditions imposed for provisional release of seized imported goods shouldn’t amount to virtual denial of relief: CESTAT. *  GST SCN without alleging fraud cannot invoke sec. 74: Karnataka High Court quashes adjudication order. *  Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked Merely on Form 26AS Data: CESTAT *  Revenue-Sharing with Restaurants Not Taxable as Business Support Service: CESTAT *  R. 6(3) Option Can’t Be Forced on Taxpayer; CESTAT Quashes Rs. 12.36 Crore CENVAT Credit Demand *  Excise Duty | Power Consumption Alone Can’t Prove Clandestine Manufacture: Karnataka High Court *  Madras High Court Examines DGGI’s Authority to Issue GST Penalty Orders Under Section 122, Adds DGGI as Party *  Proceedings under omitted r. 96(10) can’t survive without saving clause: andhra pradesh high court quashes gst refund recovery *  Excise duty power consumption alone can’t prove clandestine manufacture: karnataka high court *  Madras high court rules GST show cause notices must disclose grounds for invoking extended limitation *  Court Can’t Direct Extension GST Return Deadlines or Waive Interest and Penalties: Karnataka High Court *  GST Notifications Can’t Go Beyond GST Council Recommendations: Madras High Court Quashes SCN on Branded Pulses *  Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed for Delay When Dept’s Own Order Mis-states Limitation Period: CESTAT *  No Evidence of KYC or Due Diligence Breach By Customs Broker: CESTAT Quashes Licence Revocation in Export Overvaluation Case *  Glucometers Are Chemical Analysis Instruments Classifiable Under Tariff Heading 9027: CESTAT *  Validity of Post-GST Service Tax Proceedings Upheld: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Challenge to S. 73 SCN *  Rectified GST Refund Applications Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred If Original Refund Claim Was Filed Within Limitation: Gujarat HC *  Service Tax Refund Can’t Be Denied as Time-Barred When Levy Itself Is Unconstitutional: Gujarat High Court *  Same Officer Can’t Act As Auditor & Adjudicator: Karnataka High Court *  Karnataka High Court Condones 324-Day Delay, Revives Customs Appeal in Jewellery Pilferage Case  *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Order Passed Ex Parte Despite Prior ITC Reversal; Lifts Bank Attachment *  Tobacco Process Doesn’t Amount to Manufacturing: Madras High Court Quashes Rs. 1.32 Crore Compensation Cess Demand  *  Recovery Notice Unsustainable After Voluntary Reversal of Unutilised Credit: CESTAT  *  GST | ‘System Generated’ SCN Without Officer Details Invalid: Allahabad HC  *  Electronic Records Without Statutory Certification Requirements Can’t Justify Undervaluation Allegations: CESTAT *  Madras High Court Stays GST Order, Finds Prima Facie Merit in Plea Against S. 74 Proceedings Based on S. 73 Intimation  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE No. 105 ON ANALYSIS OF ITC ADMISSIBILITY ON HIRING OF MOTOR VEHICLE

GST UPDATE No. 105 ON ANALYSIS OF ITC ADMISSIBILITY ON HIRING OF MOTOR VEHICLE
In our earlier update, we had discussed the favourable ruling pronounced by UP AAR in the case of DR WILLMAR SCHWABE (I) PRIVATE LIMITED wherein it was held that the ITC with respect to hiring of motor vehicles is available to the applicant. In the present update, we seek to discuss the detailed reasoning behind the favourable decision pronounced by the UP AAR in light of the amended provisions contained in section 17(5) of the CGST Act, 2017. In order to understand the interpretation of the provision, the relevant extracts are produced for the sake of convenient reference as follows:- (5) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1) of section 16 and sub- section (1) of section 18, input tax credit shall not be available in respect of the following, namely:— (a) motor vehicles for transportation of persons having approved seating capacity of not more than thirteen persons (including the driver), except when they are used for making the following taxable supplies, namely:— (A) further supply of such motor vehicles; or (B) transportation of passengers; or (C) imparting training on driving such motor vehicles; (ab) services of general insurance, servicing, repair and maintenance in so far as they relate to motor vehicles, vessels or aircraft referred to in clause (a) or clause (aa): Provided that the input tax credit in respect of such services shall be available— (i) where the motor vehicles, vessels or aircraft referred to in clause (a) or clause (aa) are used for the purposes specified therein; (ii) where received by a taxable person engaged— (I) in the manufacture of such motor vehicles, vessels or aircraft; or (II) in the supply of general insurance services in respect of such motor vehicles, vessels or aircraft insured by him; (b) the following supply of goods or services or both— (i) food and beverages, outdoor catering, beauty treatment, health services, cosmetic and plastic surgery, leasing, renting or hiring of motor vehicles, vessels or aircraft referred to in clause (a) or clause (aa) except when used for the purposes specified therein, life insurance and health insurance: Provided that the input tax credit in respect of such goods or services or both shall be available where an inward supply of such goods or services or both is used by a registered person for making an outward taxable supply of the same category of goods or services or both or as an element of a taxable composite or mixed supply; (ii) membership of a club, health and fitness centre; and (iii) travel benefits extended to employees on vacation such as leave or home travel concession: Provided that the input tax credit in respect of such goods or services or both shall be available, where it is obligatory for an employer to provide the same to its employees under any law for the time being in force. After reading the above provision, following points are worth noting:- 1. The restriction as regards availment of ITC on motor vehicles used for transportation of persons is only with respect to motor vehicles having approved seating capacity of 13 passengers with certain exceptions. Consequently, there is no restriction as regards availment of ITC on motor vehicles having approved seating capacity exceeding 13 persons. 2. Similarly, the restriction as regards availment of ITC on various services relating to motor vehicle such as of general insurance, servicing, repair and maintenance is also with respect to motor vehicles referred to in clause (a) being motor vehicles having approved seating capacity of 13 persons. Hence, there is no restriction in availment of such services in relation to motor vehicles having approved seating capacity exceeding 13 persons. However, with respect to motor vehicles having approved seating capacity of 13 persons, the ITC may be availed only if such motor vehicles are being used for specified purposes or such services are availed by general insurance service provider/manufacturer of such motor vehicle. 3. It is pertinent to mention that even the restriction of credit availment with respect to leasing, renting or hiring of motor vehicles is for motor vehicles having approved seating capacity of 13 persons as referred to in clause (a) and not for motor vehicles having approved seating capacity exceeding 13 persons. As such, there is no prohibition for availing input tax credit with respect to motor vehicle such as bus having approved seating capacity exceeding 13 persons, whether it be credit of purchase of bus or credit of various input services received as stated above. 4. There are two exceptions for availing the ITC of motor vehicles with approved seating capacity of 13 persons:- (i) If said services are used for providing an outward supply of same category of service. (ii) If said services are obligatory on part of employer to provide it for employees under any law for the time being in force. It is pertinent to mention here that as far as availability of credit under 4(i) is concerned, it is worth pointing out that the rate notification no. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 prescribing GST rate of 5% specifies condition that the ITC on goods or services used in supplying the service has not been taken. However, this condition is applicable for the service provider providing services of transportation of passengers. In case where the motor vehicle has been hired for the benefit of employees by the employer, no GST is payable by the employer on the recovery made from employees as the employer is not engaged in providing transportation of passenger service in usual course of business. Moreover, as per notification no. 29/2019-Central Tax dated 31.12.2019, services provided by way of renting of motor vehicle designed to carry passengers where cost of fuel is included in the consideration charged is liable to GST under reverse charge if the services are received by a body corporate. One may ponder as to whether the ITC would be available to the employer if tax is paid under reverse charge mechanism? The answer is in affirmative as restriction is only on the service provider providing transportation of passenger service and not to the recipient body corporate paying GST under reverse charge mechanism. As far as the admissibility of ITC under 4(ii) is concerned, it is worth mentioning that an adverse view was taken by Gujarat AAR in the case of M/s TATA MOTORS LTD. as far as admissibility of ITC on canteen facility provided to employees under mandate of the Factories Act, 1948. We had made an extensive analysis on the said decision in our earlier update wherein we disagreed with the reasoning adopted by the AAR wherein it was held that the exception carved out for the obligation under any Law is not applicable for outdoor catering services. Likewise, we are of the opinion that where the renting/hiring of motor vehicles is under statutory obligation of the employer, for example, Shops and Establishments Act requires compulsory transport facility to women working late night, the ITC is admissible even if the motor vehicle is having approved seating capacity of 13 persons. The above analysis seeks to answer all the possible doubts arising as regards admissibility of ITC on the services of hiring of motor vehicles availed by the assessee under GST Law.
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com