Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST update 251 on levy of GST on educational conference organised by school

GST update 251 on levy of GST on educational conference organised by school
GST law has kept supply of certain goods and services as exempted including essential services such as health care services, educational services as it is statutory obligation of the Government to provide free education to the citizens of India. Recently, an issue was raised regarding admissibility of GST exemption on the educational conference organised by the school which was reported before Madhya Pradesh AAAR in the case ofM/S IN RE EMERALD HEIGHTS INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL SAMITI. The decision delivered in this regard is subject matter of discussion of our present update.
 
The appellant is registered as a Charitable Institution under Section 12AA of Income Tax Act and owns and runs The Emerald Heights International School. It is submitted that the society is not engaged in any other activity and does not have income other than the school. The school is not registered under GST since it is providing exempt services related to education. Further, it is affiliated with various National and International Organisations which are promoting education and sports worldwide. Amongst various organisations, it is a member of Association Round Square. The Association is an internationally diverse network of 200 like schools in 50 countries wherein they connect to world-class programmes, experiences, develop cultural networks, organises conferences etc. The appellant intends to enter into an agreement with the Association wherein the school shall be host of the conference in its own rights as a principal and not as an agent. Consideration for the above programmes shall flow from the Round Square to the appellant with the list of members and staff. The appellant sought advance ruling before AAR for which negative answers were received. The questions raised are as follows: -
1.     Will the consideration received by school from the participant school for participation of their students and staff be exempted vide S. No. 66 or 80 Vide Notification No. 12/2017 dated 28.06.2017.
2.     If it is not exempted, in which category of service it shall fall and what will be tax rate?
3.     Whether any exemption is provided to service providers of catering, security, cleaning, housekeeping etc. to an educational institution up to higher secondary be available to service providers of the appellant?
4.     Whether ITC would be eligible of all input services availed for the purpose of conference?
 
The appellant submitted that AAR passed the ruling without appreciating the facts laid down since the AAR issued order in name of “Emerald Heights School” and held that the school is not registered under Section 12 AA. However, on the other hand, considering the actual scenario, the “society” is the “appellant”. Consequently, the exemption is denied to the appellant. It was submitted that the appellant is an educational institution and therefore, entitled to exemption under Notification No. 12/2017 dated 28.06.2017. The appellant is providing services to students and teachers across the Globe who are also member of “Round Square”. Therefore, any services provided by educational institutions to its students, staff or faculty is exempted vide aforesaid Notification. Furthermore, since the appellant is an educational institution and therefore, the services provided to the appellant such as transportation, catering etc. are exempted. Also, no conditions are attached to the description of the said exemption. It is argued that the service provided by appellant stands exempted vide Entry no 80 of the said notification being services by way of coaching in recreational activities related to art, culture and sports by institution registered under Section 12AA of Income Tax Act.However, since the appellant needs to classify the nature of services under one single service head so as to claim exemption, it is submitted that the said service is exempted vide Entry No. 80 of the Exemption Notification.
 
The AAAR analysed the current scenario and held that the application made by the appellant clearly shows that the application was signed in the name of “Emerald School Heights (Runa and Owned by Emerald Heights School Samiti)”. It was stated that it is not the job of AAR/AAAR to investigate since they are not the fact-finding authorities. It is the duty of applicant to come clean hands. Further, any ruling obtained by fraud or suppression of facts may be declared void-ab-initio. The appellant in the present case declared and submitted that it is registered under Section 12AA of Income Tax Act. Further, it is evident that the charitable institution runs and owns the educational institution, practice of which exists during erstwhile GST regime. This is further explained by CBIC in its “e-version of GST Flyers at chapter number 39 of 51 chapters”. The purpose of conference is to provide recreational activity related to arts, culture or sports.Thus, it is crystal clear that service provided by conference related to training and coaching are covered under the said exemption notification and hence, not covered within the ambit of GST.  Therefore, question of category of service does not arises. As regards to input tax credit, since output tax liability stands exempted, the appellant is not eligible to avail input tax credit.
 
Although it is well known fact that advance ruling authorities are following pro-revenue approach yet, rulings like these in favour of taxpayers is what is the anticipated in future as well. Furthermore, Government ensures that every core educational service is fully exempt from GST and as in the present case, the educational conference was organised by school, no GST was payable on the same. It is also worth mentioning that although the AAAR held that the order passed by AAR is void due to wrong facts presented by the appellant, the decision was rendered on merits, that too, in favour of the appellant which is highly appreciated.
 
 
 
 
 
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com