Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST update 251 on levy of GST on educational conference organised by school

GST update 251 on levy of GST on educational conference organised by school
GST law has kept supply of certain goods and services as exempted including essential services such as health care services, educational services as it is statutory obligation of the Government to provide free education to the citizens of India. Recently, an issue was raised regarding admissibility of GST exemption on the educational conference organised by the school which was reported before Madhya Pradesh AAAR in the case ofM/S IN RE EMERALD HEIGHTS INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL SAMITI. The decision delivered in this regard is subject matter of discussion of our present update.
 
The appellant is registered as a Charitable Institution under Section 12AA of Income Tax Act and owns and runs The Emerald Heights International School. It is submitted that the society is not engaged in any other activity and does not have income other than the school. The school is not registered under GST since it is providing exempt services related to education. Further, it is affiliated with various National and International Organisations which are promoting education and sports worldwide. Amongst various organisations, it is a member of Association Round Square. The Association is an internationally diverse network of 200 like schools in 50 countries wherein they connect to world-class programmes, experiences, develop cultural networks, organises conferences etc. The appellant intends to enter into an agreement with the Association wherein the school shall be host of the conference in its own rights as a principal and not as an agent. Consideration for the above programmes shall flow from the Round Square to the appellant with the list of members and staff. The appellant sought advance ruling before AAR for which negative answers were received. The questions raised are as follows: -
1.     Will the consideration received by school from the participant school for participation of their students and staff be exempted vide S. No. 66 or 80 Vide Notification No. 12/2017 dated 28.06.2017.
2.     If it is not exempted, in which category of service it shall fall and what will be tax rate?
3.     Whether any exemption is provided to service providers of catering, security, cleaning, housekeeping etc. to an educational institution up to higher secondary be available to service providers of the appellant?
4.     Whether ITC would be eligible of all input services availed for the purpose of conference?
 
The appellant submitted that AAR passed the ruling without appreciating the facts laid down since the AAR issued order in name of “Emerald Heights School” and held that the school is not registered under Section 12 AA. However, on the other hand, considering the actual scenario, the “society” is the “appellant”. Consequently, the exemption is denied to the appellant. It was submitted that the appellant is an educational institution and therefore, entitled to exemption under Notification No. 12/2017 dated 28.06.2017. The appellant is providing services to students and teachers across the Globe who are also member of “Round Square”. Therefore, any services provided by educational institutions to its students, staff or faculty is exempted vide aforesaid Notification. Furthermore, since the appellant is an educational institution and therefore, the services provided to the appellant such as transportation, catering etc. are exempted. Also, no conditions are attached to the description of the said exemption. It is argued that the service provided by appellant stands exempted vide Entry no 80 of the said notification being services by way of coaching in recreational activities related to art, culture and sports by institution registered under Section 12AA of Income Tax Act.However, since the appellant needs to classify the nature of services under one single service head so as to claim exemption, it is submitted that the said service is exempted vide Entry No. 80 of the Exemption Notification.
 
The AAAR analysed the current scenario and held that the application made by the appellant clearly shows that the application was signed in the name of “Emerald School Heights (Runa and Owned by Emerald Heights School Samiti)”. It was stated that it is not the job of AAR/AAAR to investigate since they are not the fact-finding authorities. It is the duty of applicant to come clean hands. Further, any ruling obtained by fraud or suppression of facts may be declared void-ab-initio. The appellant in the present case declared and submitted that it is registered under Section 12AA of Income Tax Act. Further, it is evident that the charitable institution runs and owns the educational institution, practice of which exists during erstwhile GST regime. This is further explained by CBIC in its “e-version of GST Flyers at chapter number 39 of 51 chapters”. The purpose of conference is to provide recreational activity related to arts, culture or sports.Thus, it is crystal clear that service provided by conference related to training and coaching are covered under the said exemption notification and hence, not covered within the ambit of GST.  Therefore, question of category of service does not arises. As regards to input tax credit, since output tax liability stands exempted, the appellant is not eligible to avail input tax credit.
 
Although it is well known fact that advance ruling authorities are following pro-revenue approach yet, rulings like these in favour of taxpayers is what is the anticipated in future as well. Furthermore, Government ensures that every core educational service is fully exempt from GST and as in the present case, the educational conference was organised by school, no GST was payable on the same. It is also worth mentioning that although the AAAR held that the order passed by AAR is void due to wrong facts presented by the appellant, the decision was rendered on merits, that too, in favour of the appellant which is highly appreciated.
 
 
 
 
 
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com