Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  GST registration cancellation without reasons amounts to ‘Economic Death’ of business: Supreme Court. *  No GST refund if appeal before GSTAT is filed late: Gujarat High Court. *  Mere upload of GST notice on portal not valid service, appeal limitation won’t start: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Taxpayer can’t be penalised for missing notices hidden under ‘Additional Notices/Orders’: Calcutta High Court allows fresh adjudication. *  State tax officer can’t issue GST SCN beyond CBIC-assigned jurisdiction: Bombay High Court stays recovery proceedings. *  Earlier 7.5% Pre-Deposit must count towards mandatory 10% for Appeal: Uttarakhand high court quashes CESTAT Order. *  Third Parties can’t challenge GST Advance Rulings merely due to financial impact: Karnataka HC *  GST SCN generated using AI tool quashed: Punjab & Haryana High Court *  Bank Attachment Quashed as Madras HC Quashes GST Order Issued Against Deceased Person *  ITC Blocking Order for Failure to Record ‘Reason to Believe’ U/R 86A Quashed: Allahabad High Court *  Govt Extends GSTAT Appeal Filing Deadline From 30 June to July 31, 2026 *  GST Demand on RWA Stayed: Allahabad High Court Questions Taxability of Electricity Distribution to Flat Owners *  CBIC Clarifies Jurisdiction After GST Registration Transfer: Earlier Proceedings Remain Valid, New Officer to Continue Action *  GST authorities’ certification not mandatory for reimbursement, but tax payment must be proven: Karnataka HC *  Contractor can’t seek gst reimbursement through writ when contract has arbitration clause: Karnataka HC *  Unsigned Order Is No Order in Law: AP HC Quashes GST Assessment Order for Want of Officer’s Signature *  Customs Can’t Levy Rs. 1.36 Crore Cost Recovery Charges Without Proof of Full-Day Officer Deployment: CESTAT  *  12% IGST Payable On Imported Dialysis Machine Parts: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Admits Challenge to GST Limitation Extension Notifications; Grants Protection Against Coercive Recovery *  Criminal Case Can’t Run Parallel to GST Proceedings on Same Facts: Allahabad High Court *  Allahabad High Court Stays GST Detention Order; Directs Release of Vehicle and Goods on Deposit of Rs. 1.44 Lakh *  Service Tax Can’t Be Levied on Loss-Making Contracts: Gujarat High Court *  GSTN Mandates Ship-to GSTIN in e-Invoice and e-Way Bill APIs; Introduces Voluntary e-Way Bill Closure Facility from August 1, 2026 *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred When Taxpayer Was Pursuing Rectification Remedy: Telangana High Court *  Absence of E-Way Bill and Transport Documents Justifies Customs Seizure U/s 110: Gauhati HC *  Madras High Court Upholds GST Late Fee and Penalty for Non-Filing of Annual Return, Dismisses Challenge  *  GST Records, Purchase Documents Sufficient to Discharge Burden Under Customs Act: CESTAT Orders Release of 3.65 Kg Gold  *  No Sugar Cess Payable on Sugar Exported Out of India: CESTAT *  Road Construction Services Exempt and SCN Time-Barred: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand Based Solely on Form 26AS  *  ITC Freeze Upheld After GST Dept Find Suppliers Were Allegedly Fake Bill-Trading Entities: Madras HC 
Subject News *  Input service benefits can’t be denied: CESTAT allows export refund despite MMTC acting as Canalising agency. *  No service tax demand without proof of service of SCN: CESTAT. *  Service tax demand quashed as dept. fails to prove service of SCN: CESTAT *  GST : Mere allegation of inadequate consideration of reply not enough to invoke writ jurisdiction: Delhi High Court *  Onerous conditions imposed for provisional release of seized imported goods shouldn’t amount to virtual denial of relief: CESTAT. *  GST SCN without alleging fraud cannot invoke sec. 74: Karnataka High Court quashes adjudication order. *  Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked Merely on Form 26AS Data: CESTAT *  Revenue-Sharing with Restaurants Not Taxable as Business Support Service: CESTAT *  R. 6(3) Option Can’t Be Forced on Taxpayer; CESTAT Quashes Rs. 12.36 Crore CENVAT Credit Demand *  Excise Duty | Power Consumption Alone Can’t Prove Clandestine Manufacture: Karnataka High Court *  Madras High Court Examines DGGI’s Authority to Issue GST Penalty Orders Under Section 122, Adds DGGI as Party *  Proceedings under omitted r. 96(10) can’t survive without saving clause: andhra pradesh high court quashes gst refund recovery *  Excise duty power consumption alone can’t prove clandestine manufacture: karnataka high court *  Madras high court rules GST show cause notices must disclose grounds for invoking extended limitation *  Court Can’t Direct Extension GST Return Deadlines or Waive Interest and Penalties: Karnataka High Court *  GST Notifications Can’t Go Beyond GST Council Recommendations: Madras High Court Quashes SCN on Branded Pulses *  Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed for Delay When Dept’s Own Order Mis-states Limitation Period: CESTAT *  No Evidence of KYC or Due Diligence Breach By Customs Broker: CESTAT Quashes Licence Revocation in Export Overvaluation Case *  Glucometers Are Chemical Analysis Instruments Classifiable Under Tariff Heading 9027: CESTAT *  Validity of Post-GST Service Tax Proceedings Upheld: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Challenge to S. 73 SCN *  Rectified GST Refund Applications Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred If Original Refund Claim Was Filed Within Limitation: Gujarat HC *  Service Tax Refund Can’t Be Denied as Time-Barred When Levy Itself Is Unconstitutional: Gujarat High Court *  Same Officer Can’t Act As Auditor & Adjudicator: Karnataka High Court *  Karnataka High Court Condones 324-Day Delay, Revives Customs Appeal in Jewellery Pilferage Case  *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Order Passed Ex Parte Despite Prior ITC Reversal; Lifts Bank Attachment *  Tobacco Process Doesn’t Amount to Manufacturing: Madras High Court Quashes Rs. 1.32 Crore Compensation Cess Demand  *  Recovery Notice Unsustainable After Voluntary Reversal of Unutilised Credit: CESTAT  *  GST | ‘System Generated’ SCN Without Officer Details Invalid: Allahabad HC  *  Electronic Records Without Statutory Certification Requirements Can’t Justify Undervaluation Allegations: CESTAT *  Madras High Court Stays GST Order, Finds Prima Facie Merit in Plea Against S. 74 Proceedings Based on S. 73 Intimation  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST update 251 on levy of GST on educational conference organised by school

GST update 251 on levy of GST on educational conference organised by school
GST law has kept supply of certain goods and services as exempted including essential services such as health care services, educational services as it is statutory obligation of the Government to provide free education to the citizens of India. Recently, an issue was raised regarding admissibility of GST exemption on the educational conference organised by the school which was reported before Madhya Pradesh AAAR in the case ofM/S IN RE EMERALD HEIGHTS INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL SAMITI. The decision delivered in this regard is subject matter of discussion of our present update.
 
The appellant is registered as a Charitable Institution under Section 12AA of Income Tax Act and owns and runs The Emerald Heights International School. It is submitted that the society is not engaged in any other activity and does not have income other than the school. The school is not registered under GST since it is providing exempt services related to education. Further, it is affiliated with various National and International Organisations which are promoting education and sports worldwide. Amongst various organisations, it is a member of Association Round Square. The Association is an internationally diverse network of 200 like schools in 50 countries wherein they connect to world-class programmes, experiences, develop cultural networks, organises conferences etc. The appellant intends to enter into an agreement with the Association wherein the school shall be host of the conference in its own rights as a principal and not as an agent. Consideration for the above programmes shall flow from the Round Square to the appellant with the list of members and staff. The appellant sought advance ruling before AAR for which negative answers were received. The questions raised are as follows: -
1.     Will the consideration received by school from the participant school for participation of their students and staff be exempted vide S. No. 66 or 80 Vide Notification No. 12/2017 dated 28.06.2017.
2.     If it is not exempted, in which category of service it shall fall and what will be tax rate?
3.     Whether any exemption is provided to service providers of catering, security, cleaning, housekeeping etc. to an educational institution up to higher secondary be available to service providers of the appellant?
4.     Whether ITC would be eligible of all input services availed for the purpose of conference?
 
The appellant submitted that AAR passed the ruling without appreciating the facts laid down since the AAR issued order in name of “Emerald Heights School” and held that the school is not registered under Section 12 AA. However, on the other hand, considering the actual scenario, the “society” is the “appellant”. Consequently, the exemption is denied to the appellant. It was submitted that the appellant is an educational institution and therefore, entitled to exemption under Notification No. 12/2017 dated 28.06.2017. The appellant is providing services to students and teachers across the Globe who are also member of “Round Square”. Therefore, any services provided by educational institutions to its students, staff or faculty is exempted vide aforesaid Notification. Furthermore, since the appellant is an educational institution and therefore, the services provided to the appellant such as transportation, catering etc. are exempted. Also, no conditions are attached to the description of the said exemption. It is argued that the service provided by appellant stands exempted vide Entry no 80 of the said notification being services by way of coaching in recreational activities related to art, culture and sports by institution registered under Section 12AA of Income Tax Act.However, since the appellant needs to classify the nature of services under one single service head so as to claim exemption, it is submitted that the said service is exempted vide Entry No. 80 of the Exemption Notification.
 
The AAAR analysed the current scenario and held that the application made by the appellant clearly shows that the application was signed in the name of “Emerald School Heights (Runa and Owned by Emerald Heights School Samiti)”. It was stated that it is not the job of AAR/AAAR to investigate since they are not the fact-finding authorities. It is the duty of applicant to come clean hands. Further, any ruling obtained by fraud or suppression of facts may be declared void-ab-initio. The appellant in the present case declared and submitted that it is registered under Section 12AA of Income Tax Act. Further, it is evident that the charitable institution runs and owns the educational institution, practice of which exists during erstwhile GST regime. This is further explained by CBIC in its “e-version of GST Flyers at chapter number 39 of 51 chapters”. The purpose of conference is to provide recreational activity related to arts, culture or sports.Thus, it is crystal clear that service provided by conference related to training and coaching are covered under the said exemption notification and hence, not covered within the ambit of GST.  Therefore, question of category of service does not arises. As regards to input tax credit, since output tax liability stands exempted, the appellant is not eligible to avail input tax credit.
 
Although it is well known fact that advance ruling authorities are following pro-revenue approach yet, rulings like these in favour of taxpayers is what is the anticipated in future as well. Furthermore, Government ensures that every core educational service is fully exempt from GST and as in the present case, the educational conference was organised by school, no GST was payable on the same. It is also worth mentioning that although the AAAR held that the order passed by AAR is void due to wrong facts presented by the appellant, the decision was rendered on merits, that too, in favour of the appellant which is highly appreciated.
 
 
 
 
 
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com