Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  GST registration cancellation without reasons amounts to ‘Economic Death’ of business: Supreme Court. *  No GST refund if appeal before GSTAT is filed late: Gujarat High Court. *  Mere upload of GST notice on portal not valid service, appeal limitation won’t start: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Taxpayer can’t be penalised for missing notices hidden under ‘Additional Notices/Orders’: Calcutta High Court allows fresh adjudication. *  State tax officer can’t issue GST SCN beyond CBIC-assigned jurisdiction: Bombay High Court stays recovery proceedings. *  Earlier 7.5% Pre-Deposit must count towards mandatory 10% for Appeal: Uttarakhand high court quashes CESTAT Order. *  Third Parties can’t challenge GST Advance Rulings merely due to financial impact: Karnataka HC *  GST SCN generated using AI tool quashed: Punjab & Haryana High Court *  Bank Attachment Quashed as Madras HC Quashes GST Order Issued Against Deceased Person *  ITC Blocking Order for Failure to Record ‘Reason to Believe’ U/R 86A Quashed: Allahabad High Court *  Govt Extends GSTAT Appeal Filing Deadline From 30 June to July 31, 2026 *  GST Demand on RWA Stayed: Allahabad High Court Questions Taxability of Electricity Distribution to Flat Owners *  CBIC Clarifies Jurisdiction After GST Registration Transfer: Earlier Proceedings Remain Valid, New Officer to Continue Action *  GST authorities’ certification not mandatory for reimbursement, but tax payment must be proven: Karnataka HC *  Contractor can’t seek gst reimbursement through writ when contract has arbitration clause: Karnataka HC *  Unsigned Order Is No Order in Law: AP HC Quashes GST Assessment Order for Want of Officer’s Signature *  Customs Can’t Levy Rs. 1.36 Crore Cost Recovery Charges Without Proof of Full-Day Officer Deployment: CESTAT  *  12% IGST Payable On Imported Dialysis Machine Parts: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Admits Challenge to GST Limitation Extension Notifications; Grants Protection Against Coercive Recovery *  Criminal Case Can’t Run Parallel to GST Proceedings on Same Facts: Allahabad High Court *  Allahabad High Court Stays GST Detention Order; Directs Release of Vehicle and Goods on Deposit of Rs. 1.44 Lakh *  Service Tax Can’t Be Levied on Loss-Making Contracts: Gujarat High Court *  GSTN Mandates Ship-to GSTIN in e-Invoice and e-Way Bill APIs; Introduces Voluntary e-Way Bill Closure Facility from August 1, 2026 *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred When Taxpayer Was Pursuing Rectification Remedy: Telangana High Court *  Absence of E-Way Bill and Transport Documents Justifies Customs Seizure U/s 110: Gauhati HC *  Madras High Court Upholds GST Late Fee and Penalty for Non-Filing of Annual Return, Dismisses Challenge  *  GST Records, Purchase Documents Sufficient to Discharge Burden Under Customs Act: CESTAT Orders Release of 3.65 Kg Gold  *  No Sugar Cess Payable on Sugar Exported Out of India: CESTAT *  Road Construction Services Exempt and SCN Time-Barred: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand Based Solely on Form 26AS  *  ITC Freeze Upheld After GST Dept Find Suppliers Were Allegedly Fake Bill-Trading Entities: Madras HC 
Subject News *  Input service benefits can’t be denied: CESTAT allows export refund despite MMTC acting as Canalising agency. *  No service tax demand without proof of service of SCN: CESTAT. *  Service tax demand quashed as dept. fails to prove service of SCN: CESTAT *  GST : Mere allegation of inadequate consideration of reply not enough to invoke writ jurisdiction: Delhi High Court *  Onerous conditions imposed for provisional release of seized imported goods shouldn’t amount to virtual denial of relief: CESTAT. *  GST SCN without alleging fraud cannot invoke sec. 74: Karnataka High Court quashes adjudication order. *  Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked Merely on Form 26AS Data: CESTAT *  Revenue-Sharing with Restaurants Not Taxable as Business Support Service: CESTAT *  R. 6(3) Option Can’t Be Forced on Taxpayer; CESTAT Quashes Rs. 12.36 Crore CENVAT Credit Demand *  Excise Duty | Power Consumption Alone Can’t Prove Clandestine Manufacture: Karnataka High Court *  Madras High Court Examines DGGI’s Authority to Issue GST Penalty Orders Under Section 122, Adds DGGI as Party *  Proceedings under omitted r. 96(10) can’t survive without saving clause: andhra pradesh high court quashes gst refund recovery *  Excise duty power consumption alone can’t prove clandestine manufacture: karnataka high court *  Madras high court rules GST show cause notices must disclose grounds for invoking extended limitation *  Court Can’t Direct Extension GST Return Deadlines or Waive Interest and Penalties: Karnataka High Court *  GST Notifications Can’t Go Beyond GST Council Recommendations: Madras High Court Quashes SCN on Branded Pulses *  Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed for Delay When Dept’s Own Order Mis-states Limitation Period: CESTAT *  No Evidence of KYC or Due Diligence Breach By Customs Broker: CESTAT Quashes Licence Revocation in Export Overvaluation Case *  Glucometers Are Chemical Analysis Instruments Classifiable Under Tariff Heading 9027: CESTAT *  Validity of Post-GST Service Tax Proceedings Upheld: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Challenge to S. 73 SCN *  Rectified GST Refund Applications Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred If Original Refund Claim Was Filed Within Limitation: Gujarat HC *  Service Tax Refund Can’t Be Denied as Time-Barred When Levy Itself Is Unconstitutional: Gujarat High Court *  Same Officer Can’t Act As Auditor & Adjudicator: Karnataka High Court *  Karnataka High Court Condones 324-Day Delay, Revives Customs Appeal in Jewellery Pilferage Case  *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Order Passed Ex Parte Despite Prior ITC Reversal; Lifts Bank Attachment *  Tobacco Process Doesn’t Amount to Manufacturing: Madras High Court Quashes Rs. 1.32 Crore Compensation Cess Demand  *  Recovery Notice Unsustainable After Voluntary Reversal of Unutilised Credit: CESTAT  *  GST | ‘System Generated’ SCN Without Officer Details Invalid: Allahabad HC  *  Electronic Records Without Statutory Certification Requirements Can’t Justify Undervaluation Allegations: CESTAT *  Madras High Court Stays GST Order, Finds Prima Facie Merit in Plea Against S. 74 Proceedings Based on S. 73 Intimation  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST RATE ON CANTEENS-CONFUSION SETTLED

GST RATE ON CANTEENS-CONFUSION SETTLED
GST RATE ON CANTEENS-CONFUSION SETTLED
 
The rate of GST on food and beverages supplied in canteens/mess has been a point of dispute in the GST era as the clarification issued by the government and the ruling pronounced by the Authority for Advance Ruling have been in total contradiction to each other. The present write up seeks to discuss the ambiguity as regards the applicable rate of GST on canteens and the recent amendment made by the government vide Notification No. 13/2018-Central Tax (Rate) dated 26.07.2018.
The serial no. 7(1) of the notification no. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 as substituted by Notification No. 46/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 14.11.2017 w.e.f. 15.11.2017 prescribed the rate of GST applicable on supply of food or beverages by a restaurant, eating joint including mess, canteen as 5% without the facility of input tax credit. The said entry read as follows:-
S. No. Chapter Heading Description of service Rate (%) Condition
7 9963
Accommodation, food and beverage services)
Supply,by way of or as part of any service or in any other manner whatsoever, of goods, being food or any other article for human consumption or drink, where such supply or service is for cash, deferred payment or other valuable consideration, provided by a restaurant, eating joint including mess, canteen, whether for consumption on or away from the premises where such food or any other article for human consumption or drink is supplied, other than those located in the premises of hotels, inns, guest houses, clubs, campsites or other commercial places meant for residential or lodging purposes having declared tariff of any unit of accommodation of seven thousand five hundred rupees and above per unit per day or equivalent.
 Explanation.- “declared tariff” includes charges for all amenities provided in the unit of accommodation (given on rent for stay) like furniture, air conditioner, refrigerators or any other amenities, but without excluding any discount offered on the published charges for such unit.
2.5% Provided that credit of input tax charged on goods and services used in supplying the service has not been taken [Please refer to Explanation no. (iv)].
 
It is submitted that although the entry 7(i) specifically mentioned canteen, mess but there was confusion as regards the GST rate to be charged by the contractors supplying food and beverages in canteen/mess established by industrial units/hospitals/educational institutions etc. This is for the reason that the entry only covered supply of food and beverages by canteen/mess and so it was opined that contractors preparing food in such canteens were to be considered as outdoor caterer liable to GST rate of 18% according to the then entry 7(v) of the notification no. 46/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 14.11.2017 w.e.f. 15.11.2017 which simply covered services provided by outdoor caterers whether on occasional basis or regular basis. In this context, reference may be made to the Advance Ruling pronounced in the case of RASHMI HOSPITALITY SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED [2018 (13) G.S.T.L. 211 (A.A.R.-GST)] given on 21.03.2018 wherein it was held that a contractor engaged for running canteen set up for workers/employees of a company is liable to pay GST at the rate of 18% under serial no. 7(v) as outdoor caterer as the contractor was providing services from other than his own premises as held in the case of Indian Coffee Workers’ Cooperative Society Ltd. Vs Commissioner [2014 (34) S.T.R. 546 (All.)]. It is pertinent to mention here that while passing this decision, advance ruling also considered the clarification issued by CBIC vide Circular No. 28/02/2018-GST dated 08.01.2018 which stated that supply of food or drink provided by a mess or canteen is taxable at the rate of 5% without input tax credit (ITC) under serial no. 7(i) of the notification no. 46/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 14.11.2017. It is also worth noting that it was clearly mentioned in this circular read with Corrigendum dated 18.01.2018 that GST is to be payable at the rate of 5% without ITC even by the contractor appointed by the educational institution with respect to canteen services provided by such contractor. It is submitted that inspite of the clarification by the CBIC, the Authority for Advance Ruling held that contractors supplying food in canteens are required to discharge GST at the rate of 18% as outdoor caterer under serial no. 7(v) of the notification no. 46/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 14.11.2017 by placing reliance on the decision given in erstwhile Service Tax Laws with respect to outdoor caterer.
The GST Council Meeting held on 21.07.2018 resolved the confusion created by the Advance Ruling and has amended the serial no. 7(i) of the Notification no. 46/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 14.11.2017. The amendment made in serial no. 7(i) vide notification no. 13/2018-Central Tax (Rate) dated 26.07.2018 reads as follows:-
S. No. Chapter Heading Description of service Rate (%) Condition
7 9963
Accommodation, food and beverage services)
 
Supply,by way of or as part of any service, of goods, being food or any other article for human consumption or any drink, provided by a restaurant, eating joint including mess, canteen, whether for consumption on or away from the premises where such food or any other article for human consumption or drink is supplied, other than those located in the premises of hotels, inns, guest houses, clubs, campsites or other commercial places meant for residential or lodging purposes having declared tariff of any unit of accommodation of seven thousand five hundred rupees and above per unit per day or equivalent.
 
Explanation 1.- This item includes such supply at a canteen, mess, cafeteria or dining space of an institution such as a school, college, hospital, industrial unit, office, by such institution or by any other person based on a contractual arrangement with such institution for such supply, provided that such supply is not event based or occasional.
 
Explanation 2.- This item excludes the supplies covered under item 7 (v).
 
Explanation 3.- “declared tariff” includes charges for all amenities provided in the unit of accommodation (given on rent for stay) like furniture, air conditioner, refrigerators or any other amenities, but without excluding any discount offered on the published charges for such unit.
2.5% Provided that credit of input tax charged on goods and services used in supplying the service has not been taken [Please refer to Explanation no. (iv)].
 
It is submitted that the explanation to the amended entry clearly states that serial no. 7(i) includes supply of food and beverages by canteen, mess, cafeteria of an institution by such institution or any other person based on contractual arrangement with such institution with the condition that such supply is not occasional. Hence, the explanation leaves no room for doubt that the supply of food by canteens in an institution; whether the supply is by institution or by contractors engaged by institution will attract GST rate of 5% without ITC. Moreover, entry no. 7(v) pertaining to outdoor caterers has also been amended to specify GST rate of 18% for outdoor caterers supplying food on occasional basis for events and such outdoor caterers are not covered under serial no. 7(i).
In nutshell, the amendment seeks to settle the dispute regarding applicability of GST rate on supply of food in canteens by contractors. Now, the contractors are required to charge GST at the rate of 5% to the institutions appointing them for supplying food in canteens run by such institutions. However, such institutions will not be eligible for availing the ITC of the GST paid to such contractors. Moreover, the companies maintaining canteens for their employees will again have to discharge GST at the rate of 5% on the food supplied to their employees as under GST era, employee and employer are related persons and this view was also confirmed in the Advance Ruling pronounced in the case of CALTECH POLYMERS PVT. LTD. [2018 (12) G.S.T.L. 350 (A.A.R-GST)]. In such situations, the effective GST rate would be 10% (5%+5%) as no ITC is admissible to the companies.  
 
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com