Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Missing seized records must be considered while testing ITC claim; duplicate GST demands ordered corrected: Delhi High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be rejected without addressing taxpayer’s grounds: Allahabad High Court. *  Surplus IGST credit can offset CGST, SGST shortfall: GSTAT. *  GST refund can’t be denied when cancelled airfares are returned with tax: GSTAT. *  3 Hearing notices issued within 2 minutes: Gujarat High Court flags portal flaw, seeks report. *  GSTR-9, GSTR-9C filing for FY 2025-26 enabled; pending GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B must be filed first. *  Dupattas are exempt fabrics, can’t be taxed as fibres at 4%: Madras High Court. *  Full transitional credit allowed on capital goods received after GST rollout: GSTAT denies Rs. 6.99 lakh export duty credit. *  GST return mismatch alone can’t justify fraud proceedings: GSTAT orders fresh adjudication under section 73. *  Supplier found non-existent later can’t alone justify input tax credit denial: GSTAT. *  GST interest stops once tax reaches government account, can’t run until return filing: GSTAT. *  Cancelled flat booking- GST refund can’t be denied without excluding COVID period from limitation: GSTAT. *  India notifies rules of origin for India–New Zealand FTA. *  Incomplete E-bike kits classifiable as complete vehicles, but not eligible for CKD duty concession: CESTAT. *  Same GST rate on main input and output can’t by itself bar inverted duty refund: GSTAT. *  Unjust enrichment doesn’t apply to customs refunds from assessments finalised before July 13, 2006: Gujarat High Court. *  CENVAT credit can’t be denied solely because plant And machinery are embedded in earth: Karnataka High Court. *  DFIA exports ineligible for RoDTEP benefits; customs directs repayment with applicable interest. *  Second E-Way bill alone doesn’t prove another supply: GSTAT. *  Bail denied in Rs. 1.19 crore fake GST refund case over risk of accused absconding again: Punjab and Haryana High Court. *  GST registration can be restored after revocation deadline if outstanding dues are paid: Gauhati High Court. *  Multiple GST proceedings over same suppliers: Calcutta High Court directs dept. to share findings for adjudication. *  E-Governance portal services not OIDAR, fixed deposit interest not taxable: CESTAT. *  Rs. 500 Stamp duty required on authority letters for CAs, CMA and GST practitioners in Pune GST division.  *  Rs. 1.10 crore GST refund must be paid in cash after business closure: Allahabad High Court. *  Godown rent attracts 18% GST even when used exclusively for exempt agricultural warehousing: AAR. *  GST portal launches "Multi-State Registration" facility: one master TRN for registration applications across multiple States/UTs. *  RoDTEP scheme extended till 31st December, 2026.  *  Mere disagreement with order can’t override Rs. 20 lakh appeal limit: GSTAT. *  Customs interest can’t be backdated before confiscation liability is determined; nearly 8 year period excluded: Delhi High Court.
Subject News *  GST summons: anticipatory bail maintainable without arrest order, but relief denied in evasion case: Allahabad High Court. *  GST Appeal can’t be decided without hearing taxpayer’s objections to fresh evidence: Allahabad High Court. *  GST ITC can’t be reversed merely because supplier grants discount without reducing tax liability: GSTAT. *  Mere quoting of GST provision is not a valid charge: GSTAT quashes ITC denial. *  Personal hearing mandatory before adverse GST order, even without taxpayer’s request: Rajasthan High Court. *  Parallel bail pleas without full disclosure amount to abuse of process Rs. 43.08 crore GST case sent for fresh hearing: Supreme Court. *  GST refund based on unchallenged advance ruling can’t be recovered using later circular: GSTAT. *  Payment of GST alone doesn’t end interest and penalty liability when tax and interest remain unpaid beyond 30 days of notice: GSTAT. *  GST demand over builders’ 80% procurement rule requires reasoned adjudication: GSTAT. *  Eligible ITC doesn’t automatically entitle taxpayers to compensation cess refund on domestic sales: GSTAT. *  GST confiscation order passed before reply deadline invalid: GSTAT. *  GST interest can’t be retained after tax refund on delayed export receipts: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be dismissed over pre-deposit shortfall without opportunity To respond: Bombay High Court. *  DGGI SCN can’t be challenged before reply and adjudication:Chhattisgarh High Court. *  GST input tax credit can’t be denied solely due to supplier’s retrospective registration cancellation: GSTAT. *  GST notice must explain fraud allegations; merely repeating section 74 Is not enough:  Himachal Pradesh High Court. *  Audit detection alone can’t justify GST fraud penalty; specific suppression must be proved: GSTAT. *  GST order uploaded only under ‘Additional Notices’ tab without separate intimation set aside: Calcutta High Court. *  Service Tax appeal can’t be rejected for missing pre-deposit proof when payment is already recorded: CESTAT. *  SGST dept. can’t hear appeal against CGST order: Calcutta High Court. *  Mere dispatch of tax order can’t prove service or make appeal time-barred: CESTAT. *  Dealer incentives can’t be taxed merely on ledger entries: CESTAT. *  DGFT orders quashed for failure to supply DRI letter relied upon in SCN: Bombay High Court. *  GST penalty u/s 122(1A) can’t apply to Pre-2021 transactions; unregistered beneficiaries also covered: Delhi High Court. *  Expired E-way bill caused by wrong PIN code can’t justify GST penalty without intent to evade tax: GSTAT. *  Used railway rails can’t be taxed as track material without proof they are fit for reuse: CESTAT. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand on different issue: Delhi High Court. *  ITC dispute involves no question of law: GSTAT directs appeal to Vice-President. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand On different issue: Delhi High Court. *  No E-way bill required for interstate goods movement in november 2017: GSTAT quashes detention and penalty.  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST RATE ON CANTEENS-CONFUSION SETTLED

GST RATE ON CANTEENS-CONFUSION SETTLED
GST RATE ON CANTEENS-CONFUSION SETTLED
 
The rate of GST on food and beverages supplied in canteens/mess has been a point of dispute in the GST era as the clarification issued by the government and the ruling pronounced by the Authority for Advance Ruling have been in total contradiction to each other. The present write up seeks to discuss the ambiguity as regards the applicable rate of GST on canteens and the recent amendment made by the government vide Notification No. 13/2018-Central Tax (Rate) dated 26.07.2018.
The serial no. 7(1) of the notification no. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 as substituted by Notification No. 46/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 14.11.2017 w.e.f. 15.11.2017 prescribed the rate of GST applicable on supply of food or beverages by a restaurant, eating joint including mess, canteen as 5% without the facility of input tax credit. The said entry read as follows:-
S. No. Chapter Heading Description of service Rate (%) Condition
7 9963
Accommodation, food and beverage services)
Supply,by way of or as part of any service or in any other manner whatsoever, of goods, being food or any other article for human consumption or drink, where such supply or service is for cash, deferred payment or other valuable consideration, provided by a restaurant, eating joint including mess, canteen, whether for consumption on or away from the premises where such food or any other article for human consumption or drink is supplied, other than those located in the premises of hotels, inns, guest houses, clubs, campsites or other commercial places meant for residential or lodging purposes having declared tariff of any unit of accommodation of seven thousand five hundred rupees and above per unit per day or equivalent.
 Explanation.- “declared tariff” includes charges for all amenities provided in the unit of accommodation (given on rent for stay) like furniture, air conditioner, refrigerators or any other amenities, but without excluding any discount offered on the published charges for such unit.
2.5% Provided that credit of input tax charged on goods and services used in supplying the service has not been taken [Please refer to Explanation no. (iv)].
 
It is submitted that although the entry 7(i) specifically mentioned canteen, mess but there was confusion as regards the GST rate to be charged by the contractors supplying food and beverages in canteen/mess established by industrial units/hospitals/educational institutions etc. This is for the reason that the entry only covered supply of food and beverages by canteen/mess and so it was opined that contractors preparing food in such canteens were to be considered as outdoor caterer liable to GST rate of 18% according to the then entry 7(v) of the notification no. 46/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 14.11.2017 w.e.f. 15.11.2017 which simply covered services provided by outdoor caterers whether on occasional basis or regular basis. In this context, reference may be made to the Advance Ruling pronounced in the case of RASHMI HOSPITALITY SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED [2018 (13) G.S.T.L. 211 (A.A.R.-GST)] given on 21.03.2018 wherein it was held that a contractor engaged for running canteen set up for workers/employees of a company is liable to pay GST at the rate of 18% under serial no. 7(v) as outdoor caterer as the contractor was providing services from other than his own premises as held in the case of Indian Coffee Workers’ Cooperative Society Ltd. Vs Commissioner [2014 (34) S.T.R. 546 (All.)]. It is pertinent to mention here that while passing this decision, advance ruling also considered the clarification issued by CBIC vide Circular No. 28/02/2018-GST dated 08.01.2018 which stated that supply of food or drink provided by a mess or canteen is taxable at the rate of 5% without input tax credit (ITC) under serial no. 7(i) of the notification no. 46/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 14.11.2017. It is also worth noting that it was clearly mentioned in this circular read with Corrigendum dated 18.01.2018 that GST is to be payable at the rate of 5% without ITC even by the contractor appointed by the educational institution with respect to canteen services provided by such contractor. It is submitted that inspite of the clarification by the CBIC, the Authority for Advance Ruling held that contractors supplying food in canteens are required to discharge GST at the rate of 18% as outdoor caterer under serial no. 7(v) of the notification no. 46/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 14.11.2017 by placing reliance on the decision given in erstwhile Service Tax Laws with respect to outdoor caterer.
The GST Council Meeting held on 21.07.2018 resolved the confusion created by the Advance Ruling and has amended the serial no. 7(i) of the Notification no. 46/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 14.11.2017. The amendment made in serial no. 7(i) vide notification no. 13/2018-Central Tax (Rate) dated 26.07.2018 reads as follows:-
S. No. Chapter Heading Description of service Rate (%) Condition
7 9963
Accommodation, food and beverage services)
 
Supply,by way of or as part of any service, of goods, being food or any other article for human consumption or any drink, provided by a restaurant, eating joint including mess, canteen, whether for consumption on or away from the premises where such food or any other article for human consumption or drink is supplied, other than those located in the premises of hotels, inns, guest houses, clubs, campsites or other commercial places meant for residential or lodging purposes having declared tariff of any unit of accommodation of seven thousand five hundred rupees and above per unit per day or equivalent.
 
Explanation 1.- This item includes such supply at a canteen, mess, cafeteria or dining space of an institution such as a school, college, hospital, industrial unit, office, by such institution or by any other person based on a contractual arrangement with such institution for such supply, provided that such supply is not event based or occasional.
 
Explanation 2.- This item excludes the supplies covered under item 7 (v).
 
Explanation 3.- “declared tariff” includes charges for all amenities provided in the unit of accommodation (given on rent for stay) like furniture, air conditioner, refrigerators or any other amenities, but without excluding any discount offered on the published charges for such unit.
2.5% Provided that credit of input tax charged on goods and services used in supplying the service has not been taken [Please refer to Explanation no. (iv)].
 
It is submitted that the explanation to the amended entry clearly states that serial no. 7(i) includes supply of food and beverages by canteen, mess, cafeteria of an institution by such institution or any other person based on contractual arrangement with such institution with the condition that such supply is not occasional. Hence, the explanation leaves no room for doubt that the supply of food by canteens in an institution; whether the supply is by institution or by contractors engaged by institution will attract GST rate of 5% without ITC. Moreover, entry no. 7(v) pertaining to outdoor caterers has also been amended to specify GST rate of 18% for outdoor caterers supplying food on occasional basis for events and such outdoor caterers are not covered under serial no. 7(i).
In nutshell, the amendment seeks to settle the dispute regarding applicability of GST rate on supply of food in canteens by contractors. Now, the contractors are required to charge GST at the rate of 5% to the institutions appointing them for supplying food in canteens run by such institutions. However, such institutions will not be eligible for availing the ITC of the GST paid to such contractors. Moreover, the companies maintaining canteens for their employees will again have to discharge GST at the rate of 5% on the food supplied to their employees as under GST era, employee and employer are related persons and this view was also confirmed in the Advance Ruling pronounced in the case of CALTECH POLYMERS PVT. LTD. [2018 (12) G.S.T.L. 350 (A.A.R-GST)]. In such situations, the effective GST rate would be 10% (5%+5%) as no ITC is admissible to the companies.  
 
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com