Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  GST registration cancellation without reasons amounts to ‘Economic Death’ of business: Supreme Court. *  No GST refund if appeal before GSTAT is filed late: Gujarat High Court. *  Mere upload of GST notice on portal not valid service, appeal limitation won’t start: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Taxpayer can’t be penalised for missing notices hidden under ‘Additional Notices/Orders’: Calcutta High Court allows fresh adjudication. *  State tax officer can’t issue GST SCN beyond CBIC-assigned jurisdiction: Bombay High Court stays recovery proceedings. *  Earlier 7.5% Pre-Deposit must count towards mandatory 10% for Appeal: Uttarakhand high court quashes CESTAT Order. *  Third Parties can’t challenge GST Advance Rulings merely due to financial impact: Karnataka HC *  GST SCN generated using AI tool quashed: Punjab & Haryana High Court *  Bank Attachment Quashed as Madras HC Quashes GST Order Issued Against Deceased Person *  ITC Blocking Order for Failure to Record ‘Reason to Believe’ U/R 86A Quashed: Allahabad High Court *  Govt Extends GSTAT Appeal Filing Deadline From 30 June to July 31, 2026 *  GST Demand on RWA Stayed: Allahabad High Court Questions Taxability of Electricity Distribution to Flat Owners *  CBIC Clarifies Jurisdiction After GST Registration Transfer: Earlier Proceedings Remain Valid, New Officer to Continue Action *  GST authorities’ certification not mandatory for reimbursement, but tax payment must be proven: Karnataka HC *  Contractor can’t seek gst reimbursement through writ when contract has arbitration clause: Karnataka HC *  Unsigned Order Is No Order in Law: AP HC Quashes GST Assessment Order for Want of Officer’s Signature *  Customs Can’t Levy Rs. 1.36 Crore Cost Recovery Charges Without Proof of Full-Day Officer Deployment: CESTAT  *  12% IGST Payable On Imported Dialysis Machine Parts: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Admits Challenge to GST Limitation Extension Notifications; Grants Protection Against Coercive Recovery *  Criminal Case Can’t Run Parallel to GST Proceedings on Same Facts: Allahabad High Court *  Allahabad High Court Stays GST Detention Order; Directs Release of Vehicle and Goods on Deposit of Rs. 1.44 Lakh *  Service Tax Can’t Be Levied on Loss-Making Contracts: Gujarat High Court *  GSTN Mandates Ship-to GSTIN in e-Invoice and e-Way Bill APIs; Introduces Voluntary e-Way Bill Closure Facility from August 1, 2026 *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred When Taxpayer Was Pursuing Rectification Remedy: Telangana High Court *  Absence of E-Way Bill and Transport Documents Justifies Customs Seizure U/s 110: Gauhati HC *  Madras High Court Upholds GST Late Fee and Penalty for Non-Filing of Annual Return, Dismisses Challenge  *  GST Records, Purchase Documents Sufficient to Discharge Burden Under Customs Act: CESTAT Orders Release of 3.65 Kg Gold  *  No Sugar Cess Payable on Sugar Exported Out of India: CESTAT *  Road Construction Services Exempt and SCN Time-Barred: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand Based Solely on Form 26AS  *  ITC Freeze Upheld After GST Dept Find Suppliers Were Allegedly Fake Bill-Trading Entities: Madras HC 
Subject News *  Input service benefits can’t be denied: CESTAT allows export refund despite MMTC acting as Canalising agency. *  No service tax demand without proof of service of SCN: CESTAT. *  Service tax demand quashed as dept. fails to prove service of SCN: CESTAT *  GST : Mere allegation of inadequate consideration of reply not enough to invoke writ jurisdiction: Delhi High Court *  Onerous conditions imposed for provisional release of seized imported goods shouldn’t amount to virtual denial of relief: CESTAT. *  GST SCN without alleging fraud cannot invoke sec. 74: Karnataka High Court quashes adjudication order. *  Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked Merely on Form 26AS Data: CESTAT *  Revenue-Sharing with Restaurants Not Taxable as Business Support Service: CESTAT *  R. 6(3) Option Can’t Be Forced on Taxpayer; CESTAT Quashes Rs. 12.36 Crore CENVAT Credit Demand *  Excise Duty | Power Consumption Alone Can’t Prove Clandestine Manufacture: Karnataka High Court *  Madras High Court Examines DGGI’s Authority to Issue GST Penalty Orders Under Section 122, Adds DGGI as Party *  Proceedings under omitted r. 96(10) can’t survive without saving clause: andhra pradesh high court quashes gst refund recovery *  Excise duty power consumption alone can’t prove clandestine manufacture: karnataka high court *  Madras high court rules GST show cause notices must disclose grounds for invoking extended limitation *  Court Can’t Direct Extension GST Return Deadlines or Waive Interest and Penalties: Karnataka High Court *  GST Notifications Can’t Go Beyond GST Council Recommendations: Madras High Court Quashes SCN on Branded Pulses *  Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed for Delay When Dept’s Own Order Mis-states Limitation Period: CESTAT *  No Evidence of KYC or Due Diligence Breach By Customs Broker: CESTAT Quashes Licence Revocation in Export Overvaluation Case *  Glucometers Are Chemical Analysis Instruments Classifiable Under Tariff Heading 9027: CESTAT *  Validity of Post-GST Service Tax Proceedings Upheld: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Challenge to S. 73 SCN *  Rectified GST Refund Applications Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred If Original Refund Claim Was Filed Within Limitation: Gujarat HC *  Service Tax Refund Can’t Be Denied as Time-Barred When Levy Itself Is Unconstitutional: Gujarat High Court *  Same Officer Can’t Act As Auditor & Adjudicator: Karnataka High Court *  Karnataka High Court Condones 324-Day Delay, Revives Customs Appeal in Jewellery Pilferage Case  *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Order Passed Ex Parte Despite Prior ITC Reversal; Lifts Bank Attachment *  Tobacco Process Doesn’t Amount to Manufacturing: Madras High Court Quashes Rs. 1.32 Crore Compensation Cess Demand  *  Recovery Notice Unsustainable After Voluntary Reversal of Unutilised Credit: CESTAT  *  GST | ‘System Generated’ SCN Without Officer Details Invalid: Allahabad HC  *  Electronic Records Without Statutory Certification Requirements Can’t Justify Undervaluation Allegations: CESTAT *  Madras High Court Stays GST Order, Finds Prima Facie Merit in Plea Against S. 74 Proceedings Based on S. 73 Intimation  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE ON APPLICABILITY OF GST ON GOODS TRANSFERRED/SOLD FROM CUSTOM BONDED WAREHOUSE

GST NOTE ON APPLICABILITY OF GST ON GOODS TRANSFERRED/SOLD FROM CUSTOM BONDED WAREHOUSE

GST NOTE ON APPLICABILITY OF GST ON GOODS TRANSFERRED/SOLD FROM CUSTOM BONDED WAREHOUSE

 

On 24th November, 2017, CBEC issued circular no. 46/2017-Customs clarifying issues regarding levy of IGST on goods sold from custom bonded warehouse. This circular has discussed the provisions of section 14 of Customs Act, 1962 regarding the valuation of imported goods. This section states that the value of goods on which custom duty will be payable will be the value at the time of import i.e. at the time of filing of the into-bond Bill of Entry. Any costs incurred after the import of goods cannot be added to the value of the goods, for the purpose of levy of duties of customs at the stage of ex-bonding. Therefore, duties of customs (BCD + IGST) shall be paid on the imported goods at the stage of ex- bonding as per this section 14. For eg. if the value of goods imported by A is Rs. 5 lacs, rate of custom duty is 10% & rate of IGST is 18%; the amount of custom duty and IGST will be calculated as follows:-

Value of imported goods                       5,00,000

Custom duty @ 10%                                   50,000

                                                                       5,50,000

IGST @ 18%                                                  99,000

Total                                                             6,49,000

 

As per clarification given in this circular, total duty & tax payment (50,000 + 99,000) = Rs. 1,49,000/- will be deferred and will be payable at the time of ex-bonding of imported goods.

 

It has also been clarified that under IGST Act, 2017, supply of imported goods which takes place before they cross the customs frontiers of India, shall be treated as an inter-State supply on which IGST is applicable under section 7(2) of the Act. Thus, if the goods are sold to some other person, such transaction of sale/transfer will be subject to IGST under the IGST Act. The value of such supply shall be determined as per section 15 of the CGST Act read with section 20 of the IGST Act and the rules made there under, without prejudice to the fact that the liability of import duty (which includes BCD and applicable IGST payable under the Customs Tariff Act) has also arisen and will be collected at the ex-bond stage.

 

Suppose, in the above referred example, the goods are sold by A to B at Rs. 10,00,000/-. In such a case, IGST will be payable by A as follows:-

 

Value of sale                                  10,00,000

IGST @ 18%                                    1,80,000

                                                          11,80,000

 

A will issue GST invoice for this value and IGST payable on the same. The credit of IGST of Rs. 1,80,000/- will be receivable by B on this invoice issued by A.  

 

In the above case, the goods are already sold by A to B while the goods were lying at warehouse. Therefore, at the time of ex-bonding; the bill of entry will be filed by B and total tax amounting to Rs. 1,49,000/- will be payable by him to Government exchequer. The credit of IGST of Rs. 99,000/- as involved in the bill of entry will also be receivable by B on the basis of bill of entry. Therefore, in this case, credit of IGST paid at both the times, i.e. Rs. 2,48,000/- (Rs. 99,000/- + Rs. 1,49,000/-) will be available to B.

 

Suppose B further sells these goods at Rs. 12,00,000/-. The IGST at 18%, i.e. Rs. 2,16,000/- will be payable by him. In the given case, the credit available is Rs. 2,48,000/-; therefore, the entire IGST of Rs. 2,16,000/- can be paid from the credit available with him. Even after entirely using the credit, the amount of Rs. 32,000/- will be left surplus with B. This will happen in every similar case. Therefore, the accumulated credit will increase with each and every transaction. In this case, if B is trader, he will not be able to utilize the credit in any case. Also, refund of unutilized credit will not be available to him as there is neither any export nor it is the case of inverted tax structure. Thus, this clarification will result into extinguishing the practice of in-bond sale of goods. In the given situation, B will always buy the goods after the ex-bonding as in that case A will be required to pay IGST once and the same will be charged from B. B will avail its credit and will use the same at the time of paying the tax on sale made by him.

The content of this GST update is for educational purpose only and not intended for solicitation.

You can reach us at www.capradeepjain.com, at our facebook page on https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/ as well as follow us on Twitter at https://www.twitter.com/@capradeepjain21

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com