Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE ON APPLICABILITY OF GST ON GOODS TRANSFERRED/SOLD FROM CUSTOM BONDED WAREHOUSE

GST NOTE ON APPLICABILITY OF GST ON GOODS TRANSFERRED/SOLD FROM CUSTOM BONDED WAREHOUSE

GST NOTE ON APPLICABILITY OF GST ON GOODS TRANSFERRED/SOLD FROM CUSTOM BONDED WAREHOUSE

 

On 24th November, 2017, CBEC issued circular no. 46/2017-Customs clarifying issues regarding levy of IGST on goods sold from custom bonded warehouse. This circular has discussed the provisions of section 14 of Customs Act, 1962 regarding the valuation of imported goods. This section states that the value of goods on which custom duty will be payable will be the value at the time of import i.e. at the time of filing of the into-bond Bill of Entry. Any costs incurred after the import of goods cannot be added to the value of the goods, for the purpose of levy of duties of customs at the stage of ex-bonding. Therefore, duties of customs (BCD + IGST) shall be paid on the imported goods at the stage of ex- bonding as per this section 14. For eg. if the value of goods imported by A is Rs. 5 lacs, rate of custom duty is 10% & rate of IGST is 18%; the amount of custom duty and IGST will be calculated as follows:-

Value of imported goods                       5,00,000

Custom duty @ 10%                                   50,000

                                                                       5,50,000

IGST @ 18%                                                  99,000

Total                                                             6,49,000

 

As per clarification given in this circular, total duty & tax payment (50,000 + 99,000) = Rs. 1,49,000/- will be deferred and will be payable at the time of ex-bonding of imported goods.

 

It has also been clarified that under IGST Act, 2017, supply of imported goods which takes place before they cross the customs frontiers of India, shall be treated as an inter-State supply on which IGST is applicable under section 7(2) of the Act. Thus, if the goods are sold to some other person, such transaction of sale/transfer will be subject to IGST under the IGST Act. The value of such supply shall be determined as per section 15 of the CGST Act read with section 20 of the IGST Act and the rules made there under, without prejudice to the fact that the liability of import duty (which includes BCD and applicable IGST payable under the Customs Tariff Act) has also arisen and will be collected at the ex-bond stage.

 

Suppose, in the above referred example, the goods are sold by A to B at Rs. 10,00,000/-. In such a case, IGST will be payable by A as follows:-

 

Value of sale                                  10,00,000

IGST @ 18%                                    1,80,000

                                                          11,80,000

 

A will issue GST invoice for this value and IGST payable on the same. The credit of IGST of Rs. 1,80,000/- will be receivable by B on this invoice issued by A.  

 

In the above case, the goods are already sold by A to B while the goods were lying at warehouse. Therefore, at the time of ex-bonding; the bill of entry will be filed by B and total tax amounting to Rs. 1,49,000/- will be payable by him to Government exchequer. The credit of IGST of Rs. 99,000/- as involved in the bill of entry will also be receivable by B on the basis of bill of entry. Therefore, in this case, credit of IGST paid at both the times, i.e. Rs. 2,48,000/- (Rs. 99,000/- + Rs. 1,49,000/-) will be available to B.

 

Suppose B further sells these goods at Rs. 12,00,000/-. The IGST at 18%, i.e. Rs. 2,16,000/- will be payable by him. In the given case, the credit available is Rs. 2,48,000/-; therefore, the entire IGST of Rs. 2,16,000/- can be paid from the credit available with him. Even after entirely using the credit, the amount of Rs. 32,000/- will be left surplus with B. This will happen in every similar case. Therefore, the accumulated credit will increase with each and every transaction. In this case, if B is trader, he will not be able to utilize the credit in any case. Also, refund of unutilized credit will not be available to him as there is neither any export nor it is the case of inverted tax structure. Thus, this clarification will result into extinguishing the practice of in-bond sale of goods. In the given situation, B will always buy the goods after the ex-bonding as in that case A will be required to pay IGST once and the same will be charged from B. B will avail its credit and will use the same at the time of paying the tax on sale made by him.

The content of this GST update is for educational purpose only and not intended for solicitation.

You can reach us at www.capradeepjain.com, at our facebook page on https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/ as well as follow us on Twitter at https://www.twitter.com/@capradeepjain21

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com