Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE ON INDUSTRY WANTS TO KNOW

Daily Dose of GST update on FAQ in seminar with Industries

Daily Dose of GST update on FAQ in seminar with Industries
INDUSTRY WANTS TO KNOW – PART IV

 

Here is the 3rd installment to the series where we try to find answers to the unanswered questions and queries coming from the trade and industry.
Question: What will be the tax rate for the Construction Service?
Answer: The exact tax rates have not been notified yet. Although as per the last meeting of GST Council where the slab system of rates was notified, we expect that it may fall under slabs of 12% or 18%. At present, the Construction Service is subject to both VAT and Service Tax. The effective tax rate comes to around 3.75% for Service Tax. Other than that, VAT is also leviable on the Construction contracts, generally paid by way of composition. 
Question:- This is very high rate for the construction industry. Whether the industry suffering from recession will be able to aborb such a high rate? 
Answer:-In our opinion, a representation maybe filed for considering the Construction Service in the lower tax rate slab of 5%.
Question: How will the Construction Industry be benefitted by the implementation of GST?
Answer: Construction Industry is largely to be benefitted after the advent of GST. Firstly, the assessees shall be liable to single indirect tax after GST comes into play. Secondly, there will be a smoother flow of credits thus reducing their costs. In the current regime, they are not able to avail credits of excise duty, CST, Entry Tax on various inputs which used to form a non-creditable tax cost. They are able to avail only the credit of input services only. But they will be able to take the credit of inputs also like cement, tor steel, tiles etc. In current regime, they have to pay the tax on 40 or 70% under service tax composition scheme. Similarly, industry has to pay VAT under composition scheme under works contract. If we add both the composition schemes, the industry is paying tax on more than 100% in most of the cases. But under current regime, both CGST and SGST will be charged on 100% only. Hence, the net tax payable by the industry will come down. Also, increased credit flow on inputs will also bring down the tax burden. If add all, the effective tax payable will come down from current regime.
Question: What are adverse effect of GST on reality industry?
Answer:-A higher tax rate can be a damper for the construction services. Not only that, the construction industry is known to be one amongst the most unorganized industries. With the GST in force, the entire Construction Industry will have to be organized and infact the builders and contractors will have to ensure proper payment of tax by their sub-contractors. This is big difficulty in current regime for the department. But this burden will be shifted from the department to builder or main contractors. Also, on the transitional front, GST can be a setback as credit of inputs is not availed in the current regime and will thus not be carried forward. Under the transitional provisions, the credit of input services will be carried forward as shown in their return. But the construction industry is not taking credit on inputs and there is no provision also for taking the credit of the same. This is provision for not taking credit due to exemption under current regime then the credit on stock will be available if the same is chargeable to GST under proposed regime. But there is no transitional provision of taking of credit on stock of inputs when the credit is not allowed in law itself due to abatement. The industry should demand transitional provision for the same.
Question: Will the department provide any help in filing of the said minimum 37 Returns annually?
Answer: The department shall not extend any help with regards to the filing of 37 returns. Instead it is expected that these returns will be highly software dependent particularly extracting data automatically. Although being highly software driven, it should also have features of editing required to make necessary amendment, monitoring of debit and credit notes and also human intervention about which credits to be availed or not, etc.
It is important to note that this may turn out to be a complex task for Small Scale Industries and Units both in terms of time and cost.

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com