Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Missing seized records must be considered while testing ITC claim; duplicate GST demands ordered corrected: Delhi High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be rejected without addressing taxpayer’s grounds: Allahabad High Court. *  Surplus IGST credit can offset CGST, SGST shortfall: GSTAT. *  GST refund can’t be denied when cancelled airfares are returned with tax: GSTAT. *  3 Hearing notices issued within 2 minutes: Gujarat High Court flags portal flaw, seeks report. *  GSTR-9, GSTR-9C filing for FY 2025-26 enabled; pending GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B must be filed first. *  Dupattas are exempt fabrics, can’t be taxed as fibres at 4%: Madras High Court. *  Full transitional credit allowed on capital goods received after GST rollout: GSTAT denies Rs. 6.99 lakh export duty credit. *  GST return mismatch alone can’t justify fraud proceedings: GSTAT orders fresh adjudication under section 73. *  Supplier found non-existent later can’t alone justify input tax credit denial: GSTAT. *  GST interest stops once tax reaches government account, can’t run until return filing: GSTAT. *  Cancelled flat booking- GST refund can’t be denied without excluding COVID period from limitation: GSTAT. *  India notifies rules of origin for India–New Zealand FTA. *  Incomplete E-bike kits classifiable as complete vehicles, but not eligible for CKD duty concession: CESTAT. *  Same GST rate on main input and output can’t by itself bar inverted duty refund: GSTAT. *  Unjust enrichment doesn’t apply to customs refunds from assessments finalised before July 13, 2006: Gujarat High Court. *  CENVAT credit can’t be denied solely because plant And machinery are embedded in earth: Karnataka High Court. *  DFIA exports ineligible for RoDTEP benefits; customs directs repayment with applicable interest. *  Second E-Way bill alone doesn’t prove another supply: GSTAT. *  Bail denied in Rs. 1.19 crore fake GST refund case over risk of accused absconding again: Punjab and Haryana High Court. *  GST registration can be restored after revocation deadline if outstanding dues are paid: Gauhati High Court. *  Multiple GST proceedings over same suppliers: Calcutta High Court directs dept. to share findings for adjudication. *  E-Governance portal services not OIDAR, fixed deposit interest not taxable: CESTAT. *  Rs. 500 Stamp duty required on authority letters for CAs, CMA and GST practitioners in Pune GST division.  *  Rs. 1.10 crore GST refund must be paid in cash after business closure: Allahabad High Court. *  Godown rent attracts 18% GST even when used exclusively for exempt agricultural warehousing: AAR. *  GST portal launches "Multi-State Registration" facility: one master TRN for registration applications across multiple States/UTs. *  RoDTEP scheme extended till 31st December, 2026.  *  Mere disagreement with order can’t override Rs. 20 lakh appeal limit: GSTAT. *  Customs interest can’t be backdated before confiscation liability is determined; nearly 8 year period excluded: Delhi High Court.
Subject News *  GST summons: anticipatory bail maintainable without arrest order, but relief denied in evasion case: Allahabad High Court. *  GST Appeal can’t be decided without hearing taxpayer’s objections to fresh evidence: Allahabad High Court. *  GST ITC can’t be reversed merely because supplier grants discount without reducing tax liability: GSTAT. *  Mere quoting of GST provision is not a valid charge: GSTAT quashes ITC denial. *  Personal hearing mandatory before adverse GST order, even without taxpayer’s request: Rajasthan High Court. *  Parallel bail pleas without full disclosure amount to abuse of process Rs. 43.08 crore GST case sent for fresh hearing: Supreme Court. *  GST refund based on unchallenged advance ruling can’t be recovered using later circular: GSTAT. *  Payment of GST alone doesn’t end interest and penalty liability when tax and interest remain unpaid beyond 30 days of notice: GSTAT. *  GST demand over builders’ 80% procurement rule requires reasoned adjudication: GSTAT. *  Eligible ITC doesn’t automatically entitle taxpayers to compensation cess refund on domestic sales: GSTAT. *  GST confiscation order passed before reply deadline invalid: GSTAT. *  GST interest can’t be retained after tax refund on delayed export receipts: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be dismissed over pre-deposit shortfall without opportunity To respond: Bombay High Court. *  DGGI SCN can’t be challenged before reply and adjudication:Chhattisgarh High Court. *  GST input tax credit can’t be denied solely due to supplier’s retrospective registration cancellation: GSTAT. *  GST notice must explain fraud allegations; merely repeating section 74 Is not enough:  Himachal Pradesh High Court. *  Audit detection alone can’t justify GST fraud penalty; specific suppression must be proved: GSTAT. *  GST order uploaded only under ‘Additional Notices’ tab without separate intimation set aside: Calcutta High Court. *  Service Tax appeal can’t be rejected for missing pre-deposit proof when payment is already recorded: CESTAT. *  SGST dept. can’t hear appeal against CGST order: Calcutta High Court. *  Mere dispatch of tax order can’t prove service or make appeal time-barred: CESTAT. *  Dealer incentives can’t be taxed merely on ledger entries: CESTAT. *  DGFT orders quashed for failure to supply DRI letter relied upon in SCN: Bombay High Court. *  GST penalty u/s 122(1A) can’t apply to Pre-2021 transactions; unregistered beneficiaries also covered: Delhi High Court. *  Expired E-way bill caused by wrong PIN code can’t justify GST penalty without intent to evade tax: GSTAT. *  Used railway rails can’t be taxed as track material without proof they are fit for reuse: CESTAT. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand on different issue: Delhi High Court. *  ITC dispute involves no question of law: GSTAT directs appeal to Vice-President. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand On different issue: Delhi High Court. *  No E-way bill required for interstate goods movement in november 2017: GSTAT quashes detention and penalty.  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

ANALYSIS OF FINAL TRANSITIONAL RULES VIS A VIS TEXTILE SECTOR

ANALYSIS OF FINAL TRANSITIONAL RULES VIS A VIS TEXTILE SECTOR

The GST Council has finalized the transitional rules in the meeting held on 03.06.2017 and the final rules are available on the public domain. Representations were made to the government for increasing the percentage of credit admissible in case of non-availability of duty paid documents and it appears that the cries of the assessees have been considered. The final transitional rules provide that where a registered person other than a manufacturer or supplier of services, is not in possession of an invoice or any other document evidencing payment of duty, then the said person will be allowed to avail input tax credit on goods on which duty of excise or CVD under section 3(1) of the Customs Act is leviable in the following manner:-
• If the rate of CGST leviable on the goods is 9% or more, then credit admissible shall be 60% of central tax applicable. 
• If the rate of CGST leviable on goods is less than 9%, then credit admissible on such inputs shall be 40% of central tax applicable.
Furthermore, if IGST is applicable on supply, then also credit shall be admissible. In this case, goods on which IGST is leviable at the rate of 18% or above then credit admissible shall be 30%. In other cases the credit admissible shall be 20%. 
 This credit shall be allowed for 6 months subject to following conditions:-
1. These goods were not unconditionally exempt from the whole of the duty of excise or were not nil rated in the said Schedule. 
2. The procurement documents of goods is available with the registered person. 
3. The assessee must have provided details of stock in statement FORM GST TRAN 2 at the end of each of the six months giving details of supplies of such goods.
4. The credit allowed shall be credited to the electronic credit ledger of the applicant maintained in FORM GST PMT-2 on the Common Portal. 
5. The stock of goods on which the credit is availed is stored so therefore they can be easily identified by the registered person.

The above provision has great implication in the context of textile industry. It is pertinent to note that the benefit of credit shall be admissible only if such goods were not unconditionally exempt from whole of the duty of excise specified in the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 or were not nil rated in the said schedule. This condition is required to be critically analysed. It is also worth noting that the draft transitional rules released on 31.03.2017 stated the similar condition with the difference that the benefit of credit was allowed only if such goods were not wholly exempt from duty of excise specified in the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 or were not nil rated. On comparing the provisions of the final transitional rules with that proposed in the draft rules, we find that the scope of the condition has been narrowed in the final rules. As per the draft transitional rules, the benefit of deemed credit on stock of goods was available only on the condition that the goods were not wholly exempt from the duty of excise and were not nil rated. However, as per the final transitional rules, the benefit of deemed credit will not be admissible if the goods were unconditionally exempt or were nil rated. It is worth noting that the word exempt is being prefixed with word unconditional thereby meaning that if deemed credit will not be available only if the goods were unconditionally exempt or nil rated. This means that if the goods are exempt but with condition, the benefit of deemed credit will be still available. This interpretation is of immense importance to the textile industry.

Another point that needs deliberation is that the benefit of deemed credit is admissible on goods on which duty of excise or CVD under section 3(1) of the Customs Act is leviable. We submit that it is important to understand that the term used is ‘leviable’ and not ‘paid’. We submit that it is possible that the duty is leviable but the same is not paid due to exemption prevalent in law. Consequently, we may interpret that the benefit of deemed credit is admissible with respect to textile products falling under chapter 50 to 63 because the central excise duty is leviable on such products but is exempted by virtue of exemption notification no. 30/2004-CE dated 09.07.2004. Since, the term ‘leviable’ is of wider scope than ‘payable’, the goods on which central excise duty is leviable irrespective of the fact whether the said duty is paid or not will be eligible for credit availment.

Presently, according to notification no. 30/2004-C.E. dated 09.07.2004, there is complete exemption to specified textile products falling under chapter 50 to 63 on the condition that no cenvat credit of inputs has been taken. Hence, we can say that the exemption to the textile sector is a conditional exemption with the condition that cenvat credit of inputs used has not been taken. Consequently, one may interpret that trader of textile products which has procured goods cleared under notification no. 30/2004-C.E. dated 09.07.2004 may be eligible to avail the benefit of deemed credit as the restriction is only for goods which are unconditionally exempt from the whole of duty of excise. Since the goods cleared under notification no. 30/2004-C.E. dated 09.07.2004 are conditionally exempt, the embargo will not apply to such goods. This interpretation may lead to manufacturers of such products transferring all their stock to their dealers/traders as it is quite probable that such manufacturers do not have valid duty paying document to avail credit under the provision of section 140(3) of the CGST Act, 2017 but they may ensure that at least the benefit of deemed credit is taken by the dealers/traders. In our opinion, such a practise although legally valid may not be accepted by the revenue authorities and the assessees may end up fastening themselves with penal consequences.

 

You can reach us at www.capradeepjain.com

 
 and also at our facebook page at
https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com