Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

ANALYSIS OF FINAL TRANSITIONAL RULES VIS A VIS TEXTILE SECTOR

ANALYSIS OF FINAL TRANSITIONAL RULES VIS A VIS TEXTILE SECTOR

The GST Council has finalized the transitional rules in the meeting held on 03.06.2017 and the final rules are available on the public domain. Representations were made to the government for increasing the percentage of credit admissible in case of non-availability of duty paid documents and it appears that the cries of the assessees have been considered. The final transitional rules provide that where a registered person other than a manufacturer or supplier of services, is not in possession of an invoice or any other document evidencing payment of duty, then the said person will be allowed to avail input tax credit on goods on which duty of excise or CVD under section 3(1) of the Customs Act is leviable in the following manner:-
• If the rate of CGST leviable on the goods is 9% or more, then credit admissible shall be 60% of central tax applicable. 
• If the rate of CGST leviable on goods is less than 9%, then credit admissible on such inputs shall be 40% of central tax applicable.
Furthermore, if IGST is applicable on supply, then also credit shall be admissible. In this case, goods on which IGST is leviable at the rate of 18% or above then credit admissible shall be 30%. In other cases the credit admissible shall be 20%. 
 This credit shall be allowed for 6 months subject to following conditions:-
1. These goods were not unconditionally exempt from the whole of the duty of excise or were not nil rated in the said Schedule. 
2. The procurement documents of goods is available with the registered person. 
3. The assessee must have provided details of stock in statement FORM GST TRAN 2 at the end of each of the six months giving details of supplies of such goods.
4. The credit allowed shall be credited to the electronic credit ledger of the applicant maintained in FORM GST PMT-2 on the Common Portal. 
5. The stock of goods on which the credit is availed is stored so therefore they can be easily identified by the registered person.

The above provision has great implication in the context of textile industry. It is pertinent to note that the benefit of credit shall be admissible only if such goods were not unconditionally exempt from whole of the duty of excise specified in the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 or were not nil rated in the said schedule. This condition is required to be critically analysed. It is also worth noting that the draft transitional rules released on 31.03.2017 stated the similar condition with the difference that the benefit of credit was allowed only if such goods were not wholly exempt from duty of excise specified in the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 or were not nil rated. On comparing the provisions of the final transitional rules with that proposed in the draft rules, we find that the scope of the condition has been narrowed in the final rules. As per the draft transitional rules, the benefit of deemed credit on stock of goods was available only on the condition that the goods were not wholly exempt from the duty of excise and were not nil rated. However, as per the final transitional rules, the benefit of deemed credit will not be admissible if the goods were unconditionally exempt or were nil rated. It is worth noting that the word exempt is being prefixed with word unconditional thereby meaning that if deemed credit will not be available only if the goods were unconditionally exempt or nil rated. This means that if the goods are exempt but with condition, the benefit of deemed credit will be still available. This interpretation is of immense importance to the textile industry.

Another point that needs deliberation is that the benefit of deemed credit is admissible on goods on which duty of excise or CVD under section 3(1) of the Customs Act is leviable. We submit that it is important to understand that the term used is ‘leviable’ and not ‘paid’. We submit that it is possible that the duty is leviable but the same is not paid due to exemption prevalent in law. Consequently, we may interpret that the benefit of deemed credit is admissible with respect to textile products falling under chapter 50 to 63 because the central excise duty is leviable on such products but is exempted by virtue of exemption notification no. 30/2004-CE dated 09.07.2004. Since, the term ‘leviable’ is of wider scope than ‘payable’, the goods on which central excise duty is leviable irrespective of the fact whether the said duty is paid or not will be eligible for credit availment.

Presently, according to notification no. 30/2004-C.E. dated 09.07.2004, there is complete exemption to specified textile products falling under chapter 50 to 63 on the condition that no cenvat credit of inputs has been taken. Hence, we can say that the exemption to the textile sector is a conditional exemption with the condition that cenvat credit of inputs used has not been taken. Consequently, one may interpret that trader of textile products which has procured goods cleared under notification no. 30/2004-C.E. dated 09.07.2004 may be eligible to avail the benefit of deemed credit as the restriction is only for goods which are unconditionally exempt from the whole of duty of excise. Since the goods cleared under notification no. 30/2004-C.E. dated 09.07.2004 are conditionally exempt, the embargo will not apply to such goods. This interpretation may lead to manufacturers of such products transferring all their stock to their dealers/traders as it is quite probable that such manufacturers do not have valid duty paying document to avail credit under the provision of section 140(3) of the CGST Act, 2017 but they may ensure that at least the benefit of deemed credit is taken by the dealers/traders. In our opinion, such a practise although legally valid may not be accepted by the revenue authorities and the assessees may end up fastening themselves with penal consequences.

 

You can reach us at www.capradeepjain.com

 
 and also at our facebook page at
https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com