Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST update /2026-27/0007

Advance Ruling in case of M/s Codeword Process and Printers

GST UPDATE

Hon’ble Authority: Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR), Karnataka
Applicant: M/s Codeword Process and Printers
Hon’ble Authorities Shri Kalyanam Rajesh Rama Rao (Centre) and Shri Sivakumar S Itagi (State)
Date of Order 16.03.2026
Outcome In favour of the Applicant
 

Brief Facts of the Case

M/s Codeword Process and Printers (hereinafter referred to as “the applicant”) is engaged in the business of providing specialized printing services, primarily involving the printing of confidential examination question papers for universities and educational boards. The activity undertaken by the applicant is executed strictly in accordance with the specifications, format, design, and content supplied by the recipient institutions. The applicant does not exercise any control over the content of the question papers and performs the printing function under strict confidentiality protocols due to the sensitive nature of the documents. The printed materials are used exclusively for conducting examinations by universities. In this backdrop, the applicant approached the Authority for Advance Ruling seeking clarity on the applicability of GST on such services.

Relevant Section / Notification

  • Entry 66(b)(iv) of Notification No. 12/2017-CT
  • Paragraph 2y (ii) of the Notification No. 12/2017

Question before Hon’ble Authority

  • Whether universities fall within the definition of “educational institution” as per paragraph 2y of the Notification No. 12/2017?
  • Whether the activity of printing examination question papers for universities would qualify as a service “relating to the conduct of examination” provided to an educational institution, thereby making it eligible for exemption under Entry 66(b)(iv) of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate)?

Applicants Interpretation

The applicant contended that the printing of question papers is an indispensable and integral component of the examination process, without which the conduct of examinations would not be feasible.
 It was argued that the expression “relating to” used in Entry 66 is of wide amplitude and is intended to encompass not only core examination activities but also ancillary and support services that are intrinsically connected to the examination process.
The applicant further submitted that universities are undisputedly educational institutions as they provide education leading to qualifications recognized by law.

Other AAR Relied Upon

AAR Citation
Orient Press Ltd.  [2019] 106 taxmann.com 240 / (26) (AAR-Mah.) (GST/ARA/89/2018-19/B-23, dated 27.02.2019)
Ashok Kumar Basu (Manali Enterprises) In re [18/WBAAR/18-19, dated 28.09.2018] {2018 (18) G.S.T.L. 49 (AAR-GST)
Hitech Print Systems Ltd., In re [2021] 131 taxmann.com 29 / 88 GST 527 / (55) G.S.T.L. 69 (AAR-AP) {24/AP/GST/2020, dated 15.12.2020)
Management & Computers Consultants In re [2021] 133 taxmann.com 100 / [2022] 89 GST 752 / (60) G.S.T.L. 505 (AAR-WB) {08/WBAAR/2021-22,

Findings and Judgement

Regarding Universities falling in the ambit of ‘Educational Institution’
Upon examination of the Clause 2(y) of the Definitions under Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017, as amended, which is defined as follows:
 "Educational Institution" as under: "Educational institution" means an institution providing services by way of, -
i) pre-school education and education up to higher secondary school or equivalent;
( (ii) education as a part of a curriculum for obtaining a qualification recognized by any law for the time being in force;
(iii) education as a part of an approved vocational education course;
 
The Authority addressed the status of universities and concluded that they squarely fall within the definition of “educational institution” as they provide education culminating in qualifications recognized by law and are empowered to prescribe curriculam, conduct examinations, and award recognized degrees under laws such as the University Grants Commission Act, 1956. As the education provided by universities is structured and leads to recognized qualifications, they qualify as “educational institutions” under paragraph 2(y) of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate). Further, Hon’able Karnataka High Court in Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences has held that University is an educational institution for the purpose of exemption notifications. This view has been upheld by the Hon’able Supreme Court also.
Regarding taxability on activity of printing examination question papers for universities by the Applicant
The Authorities carefully analysed the language of Entry No. 66(b)(iv) of Notification No. 12/2017-CT which is reproduced as below:
“Services relating to admission to , or conduct of examination by, such instituition”
It was held that the said notification exempts services provided to educational institutions in relation to admission or conduct of examination. The phrase “relating to” has been interpreted broadly to include not only core activities but also ancillary and incidental services that have a direct nexus with such functions. Since universities are statutory educational institutions required to conduct examinations, activities like printing of question papers being indispensable and integrally connected, qualify as services relating to the conduct of examinations. This position is further supported by Circular No. 151/07/2021-GST dated 17.06.2021, which clarifies that services such as online testing, result publication, and printing of admit cards and question papers are covered under the exemption.
Accordingly, the AAR held that printing of examination question papers by the applicant is exempt from GST under Entry 66(b)(iv).
 
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com