Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  GST registration cancellation without reasons amounts to ‘Economic Death’ of business: Supreme Court. *  No GST refund if appeal before GSTAT is filed late: Gujarat High Court. *  Mere upload of GST notice on portal not valid service, appeal limitation won’t start: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Taxpayer can’t be penalised for missing notices hidden under ‘Additional Notices/Orders’: Calcutta High Court allows fresh adjudication. *  State tax officer can’t issue GST SCN beyond CBIC-assigned jurisdiction: Bombay High Court stays recovery proceedings. *  Earlier 7.5% Pre-Deposit must count towards mandatory 10% for Appeal: Uttarakhand high court quashes CESTAT Order. *  Third Parties can’t challenge GST Advance Rulings merely due to financial impact: Karnataka HC *  GST SCN generated using AI tool quashed: Punjab & Haryana High Court *  Bank Attachment Quashed as Madras HC Quashes GST Order Issued Against Deceased Person *  ITC Blocking Order for Failure to Record ‘Reason to Believe’ U/R 86A Quashed: Allahabad High Court *  Govt Extends GSTAT Appeal Filing Deadline From 30 June to July 31, 2026 *  GST Demand on RWA Stayed: Allahabad High Court Questions Taxability of Electricity Distribution to Flat Owners *  CBIC Clarifies Jurisdiction After GST Registration Transfer: Earlier Proceedings Remain Valid, New Officer to Continue Action *  GST authorities’ certification not mandatory for reimbursement, but tax payment must be proven: Karnataka HC *  Contractor can’t seek gst reimbursement through writ when contract has arbitration clause: Karnataka HC *  Unsigned Order Is No Order in Law: AP HC Quashes GST Assessment Order for Want of Officer’s Signature *  Customs Can’t Levy Rs. 1.36 Crore Cost Recovery Charges Without Proof of Full-Day Officer Deployment: CESTAT  *  12% IGST Payable On Imported Dialysis Machine Parts: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Admits Challenge to GST Limitation Extension Notifications; Grants Protection Against Coercive Recovery *  Criminal Case Can’t Run Parallel to GST Proceedings on Same Facts: Allahabad High Court *  Allahabad High Court Stays GST Detention Order; Directs Release of Vehicle and Goods on Deposit of Rs. 1.44 Lakh *  Service Tax Can’t Be Levied on Loss-Making Contracts: Gujarat High Court *  GSTN Mandates Ship-to GSTIN in e-Invoice and e-Way Bill APIs; Introduces Voluntary e-Way Bill Closure Facility from August 1, 2026 *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred When Taxpayer Was Pursuing Rectification Remedy: Telangana High Court *  Absence of E-Way Bill and Transport Documents Justifies Customs Seizure U/s 110: Gauhati HC *  Madras High Court Upholds GST Late Fee and Penalty for Non-Filing of Annual Return, Dismisses Challenge  *  GST Records, Purchase Documents Sufficient to Discharge Burden Under Customs Act: CESTAT Orders Release of 3.65 Kg Gold  *  No Sugar Cess Payable on Sugar Exported Out of India: CESTAT *  Road Construction Services Exempt and SCN Time-Barred: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand Based Solely on Form 26AS  *  ITC Freeze Upheld After GST Dept Find Suppliers Were Allegedly Fake Bill-Trading Entities: Madras HC 
Subject News *  Input service benefits can’t be denied: CESTAT allows export refund despite MMTC acting as Canalising agency. *  No service tax demand without proof of service of SCN: CESTAT. *  Service tax demand quashed as dept. fails to prove service of SCN: CESTAT *  GST : Mere allegation of inadequate consideration of reply not enough to invoke writ jurisdiction: Delhi High Court *  Onerous conditions imposed for provisional release of seized imported goods shouldn’t amount to virtual denial of relief: CESTAT. *  GST SCN without alleging fraud cannot invoke sec. 74: Karnataka High Court quashes adjudication order. *  Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked Merely on Form 26AS Data: CESTAT *  Revenue-Sharing with Restaurants Not Taxable as Business Support Service: CESTAT *  R. 6(3) Option Can’t Be Forced on Taxpayer; CESTAT Quashes Rs. 12.36 Crore CENVAT Credit Demand *  Excise Duty | Power Consumption Alone Can’t Prove Clandestine Manufacture: Karnataka High Court *  Madras High Court Examines DGGI’s Authority to Issue GST Penalty Orders Under Section 122, Adds DGGI as Party *  Proceedings under omitted r. 96(10) can’t survive without saving clause: andhra pradesh high court quashes gst refund recovery *  Excise duty power consumption alone can’t prove clandestine manufacture: karnataka high court *  Madras high court rules GST show cause notices must disclose grounds for invoking extended limitation *  Court Can’t Direct Extension GST Return Deadlines or Waive Interest and Penalties: Karnataka High Court *  GST Notifications Can’t Go Beyond GST Council Recommendations: Madras High Court Quashes SCN on Branded Pulses *  Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed for Delay When Dept’s Own Order Mis-states Limitation Period: CESTAT *  No Evidence of KYC or Due Diligence Breach By Customs Broker: CESTAT Quashes Licence Revocation in Export Overvaluation Case *  Glucometers Are Chemical Analysis Instruments Classifiable Under Tariff Heading 9027: CESTAT *  Validity of Post-GST Service Tax Proceedings Upheld: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Challenge to S. 73 SCN *  Rectified GST Refund Applications Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred If Original Refund Claim Was Filed Within Limitation: Gujarat HC *  Service Tax Refund Can’t Be Denied as Time-Barred When Levy Itself Is Unconstitutional: Gujarat High Court *  Same Officer Can’t Act As Auditor & Adjudicator: Karnataka High Court *  Karnataka High Court Condones 324-Day Delay, Revives Customs Appeal in Jewellery Pilferage Case  *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Order Passed Ex Parte Despite Prior ITC Reversal; Lifts Bank Attachment *  Tobacco Process Doesn’t Amount to Manufacturing: Madras High Court Quashes Rs. 1.32 Crore Compensation Cess Demand  *  Recovery Notice Unsustainable After Voluntary Reversal of Unutilised Credit: CESTAT  *  GST | ‘System Generated’ SCN Without Officer Details Invalid: Allahabad HC  *  Electronic Records Without Statutory Certification Requirements Can’t Justify Undervaluation Allegations: CESTAT *  Madras High Court Stays GST Order, Finds Prima Facie Merit in Plea Against S. 74 Proceedings Based on S. 73 Intimation  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST update /2026-27/0007

Advance Ruling in case of M/s Codeword Process and Printers

GST UPDATE

Hon’ble Authority: Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR), Karnataka
Applicant: M/s Codeword Process and Printers
Hon’ble Authorities Shri Kalyanam Rajesh Rama Rao (Centre) and Shri Sivakumar S Itagi (State)
Date of Order 16.03.2026
Outcome In favour of the Applicant
 

Brief Facts of the Case

M/s Codeword Process and Printers (hereinafter referred to as “the applicant”) is engaged in the business of providing specialized printing services, primarily involving the printing of confidential examination question papers for universities and educational boards. The activity undertaken by the applicant is executed strictly in accordance with the specifications, format, design, and content supplied by the recipient institutions. The applicant does not exercise any control over the content of the question papers and performs the printing function under strict confidentiality protocols due to the sensitive nature of the documents. The printed materials are used exclusively for conducting examinations by universities. In this backdrop, the applicant approached the Authority for Advance Ruling seeking clarity on the applicability of GST on such services.

Relevant Section / Notification

  • Entry 66(b)(iv) of Notification No. 12/2017-CT
  • Paragraph 2y (ii) of the Notification No. 12/2017

Question before Hon’ble Authority

  • Whether universities fall within the definition of “educational institution” as per paragraph 2y of the Notification No. 12/2017?
  • Whether the activity of printing examination question papers for universities would qualify as a service “relating to the conduct of examination” provided to an educational institution, thereby making it eligible for exemption under Entry 66(b)(iv) of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate)?

Applicants Interpretation

The applicant contended that the printing of question papers is an indispensable and integral component of the examination process, without which the conduct of examinations would not be feasible.
 It was argued that the expression “relating to” used in Entry 66 is of wide amplitude and is intended to encompass not only core examination activities but also ancillary and support services that are intrinsically connected to the examination process.
The applicant further submitted that universities are undisputedly educational institutions as they provide education leading to qualifications recognized by law.

Other AAR Relied Upon

AAR Citation
Orient Press Ltd.  [2019] 106 taxmann.com 240 / (26) (AAR-Mah.) (GST/ARA/89/2018-19/B-23, dated 27.02.2019)
Ashok Kumar Basu (Manali Enterprises) In re [18/WBAAR/18-19, dated 28.09.2018] {2018 (18) G.S.T.L. 49 (AAR-GST)
Hitech Print Systems Ltd., In re [2021] 131 taxmann.com 29 / 88 GST 527 / (55) G.S.T.L. 69 (AAR-AP) {24/AP/GST/2020, dated 15.12.2020)
Management & Computers Consultants In re [2021] 133 taxmann.com 100 / [2022] 89 GST 752 / (60) G.S.T.L. 505 (AAR-WB) {08/WBAAR/2021-22,

Findings and Judgement

Regarding Universities falling in the ambit of ‘Educational Institution’
Upon examination of the Clause 2(y) of the Definitions under Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017, as amended, which is defined as follows:
 "Educational Institution" as under: "Educational institution" means an institution providing services by way of, -
i) pre-school education and education up to higher secondary school or equivalent;
( (ii) education as a part of a curriculum for obtaining a qualification recognized by any law for the time being in force;
(iii) education as a part of an approved vocational education course;
 
The Authority addressed the status of universities and concluded that they squarely fall within the definition of “educational institution” as they provide education culminating in qualifications recognized by law and are empowered to prescribe curriculam, conduct examinations, and award recognized degrees under laws such as the University Grants Commission Act, 1956. As the education provided by universities is structured and leads to recognized qualifications, they qualify as “educational institutions” under paragraph 2(y) of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate). Further, Hon’able Karnataka High Court in Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences has held that University is an educational institution for the purpose of exemption notifications. This view has been upheld by the Hon’able Supreme Court also.
Regarding taxability on activity of printing examination question papers for universities by the Applicant
The Authorities carefully analysed the language of Entry No. 66(b)(iv) of Notification No. 12/2017-CT which is reproduced as below:
“Services relating to admission to , or conduct of examination by, such instituition”
It was held that the said notification exempts services provided to educational institutions in relation to admission or conduct of examination. The phrase “relating to” has been interpreted broadly to include not only core activities but also ancillary and incidental services that have a direct nexus with such functions. Since universities are statutory educational institutions required to conduct examinations, activities like printing of question papers being indispensable and integrally connected, qualify as services relating to the conduct of examinations. This position is further supported by Circular No. 151/07/2021-GST dated 17.06.2021, which clarifies that services such as online testing, result publication, and printing of admit cards and question papers are covered under the exemption.
Accordingly, the AAR held that printing of examination question papers by the applicant is exempt from GST under Entry 66(b)(iv).
 
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com