Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Missing seized records must be considered while testing ITC claim; duplicate GST demands ordered corrected: Delhi High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be rejected without addressing taxpayer’s grounds: Allahabad High Court. *  Surplus IGST credit can offset CGST, SGST shortfall: GSTAT. *  GST refund can’t be denied when cancelled airfares are returned with tax: GSTAT. *  3 Hearing notices issued within 2 minutes: Gujarat High Court flags portal flaw, seeks report. *  GSTR-9, GSTR-9C filing for FY 2025-26 enabled; pending GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B must be filed first. *  Dupattas are exempt fabrics, can’t be taxed as fibres at 4%: Madras High Court. *  Full transitional credit allowed on capital goods received after GST rollout: GSTAT denies Rs. 6.99 lakh export duty credit. *  GST return mismatch alone can’t justify fraud proceedings: GSTAT orders fresh adjudication under section 73. *  Supplier found non-existent later can’t alone justify input tax credit denial: GSTAT. *  GST interest stops once tax reaches government account, can’t run until return filing: GSTAT. *  Cancelled flat booking- GST refund can’t be denied without excluding COVID period from limitation: GSTAT. *  India notifies rules of origin for India–New Zealand FTA. *  Incomplete E-bike kits classifiable as complete vehicles, but not eligible for CKD duty concession: CESTAT. *  Same GST rate on main input and output can’t by itself bar inverted duty refund: GSTAT. *  Unjust enrichment doesn’t apply to customs refunds from assessments finalised before July 13, 2006: Gujarat High Court. *  CENVAT credit can’t be denied solely because plant And machinery are embedded in earth: Karnataka High Court. *  DFIA exports ineligible for RoDTEP benefits; customs directs repayment with applicable interest. *  Second E-Way bill alone doesn’t prove another supply: GSTAT. *  Bail denied in Rs. 1.19 crore fake GST refund case over risk of accused absconding again: Punjab and Haryana High Court. *  GST registration can be restored after revocation deadline if outstanding dues are paid: Gauhati High Court. *  Multiple GST proceedings over same suppliers: Calcutta High Court directs dept. to share findings for adjudication. *  E-Governance portal services not OIDAR, fixed deposit interest not taxable: CESTAT. *  Rs. 500 Stamp duty required on authority letters for CAs, CMA and GST practitioners in Pune GST division.  *  Rs. 1.10 crore GST refund must be paid in cash after business closure: Allahabad High Court. *  Godown rent attracts 18% GST even when used exclusively for exempt agricultural warehousing: AAR. *  GST portal launches "Multi-State Registration" facility: one master TRN for registration applications across multiple States/UTs. *  RoDTEP scheme extended till 31st December, 2026.  *  Mere disagreement with order can’t override Rs. 20 lakh appeal limit: GSTAT. *  Customs interest can’t be backdated before confiscation liability is determined; nearly 8 year period excluded: Delhi High Court.
Subject News *  GST summons: anticipatory bail maintainable without arrest order, but relief denied in evasion case: Allahabad High Court. *  GST Appeal can’t be decided without hearing taxpayer’s objections to fresh evidence: Allahabad High Court. *  GST ITC can’t be reversed merely because supplier grants discount without reducing tax liability: GSTAT. *  Mere quoting of GST provision is not a valid charge: GSTAT quashes ITC denial. *  Personal hearing mandatory before adverse GST order, even without taxpayer’s request: Rajasthan High Court. *  Parallel bail pleas without full disclosure amount to abuse of process Rs. 43.08 crore GST case sent for fresh hearing: Supreme Court. *  GST refund based on unchallenged advance ruling can’t be recovered using later circular: GSTAT. *  Payment of GST alone doesn’t end interest and penalty liability when tax and interest remain unpaid beyond 30 days of notice: GSTAT. *  GST demand over builders’ 80% procurement rule requires reasoned adjudication: GSTAT. *  Eligible ITC doesn’t automatically entitle taxpayers to compensation cess refund on domestic sales: GSTAT. *  GST confiscation order passed before reply deadline invalid: GSTAT. *  GST interest can’t be retained after tax refund on delayed export receipts: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be dismissed over pre-deposit shortfall without opportunity To respond: Bombay High Court. *  DGGI SCN can’t be challenged before reply and adjudication:Chhattisgarh High Court. *  GST input tax credit can’t be denied solely due to supplier’s retrospective registration cancellation: GSTAT. *  GST notice must explain fraud allegations; merely repeating section 74 Is not enough:  Himachal Pradesh High Court. *  Audit detection alone can’t justify GST fraud penalty; specific suppression must be proved: GSTAT. *  GST order uploaded only under ‘Additional Notices’ tab without separate intimation set aside: Calcutta High Court. *  Service Tax appeal can’t be rejected for missing pre-deposit proof when payment is already recorded: CESTAT. *  SGST dept. can’t hear appeal against CGST order: Calcutta High Court. *  Mere dispatch of tax order can’t prove service or make appeal time-barred: CESTAT. *  Dealer incentives can’t be taxed merely on ledger entries: CESTAT. *  DGFT orders quashed for failure to supply DRI letter relied upon in SCN: Bombay High Court. *  GST penalty u/s 122(1A) can’t apply to Pre-2021 transactions; unregistered beneficiaries also covered: Delhi High Court. *  Expired E-way bill caused by wrong PIN code can’t justify GST penalty without intent to evade tax: GSTAT. *  Used railway rails can’t be taxed as track material without proof they are fit for reuse: CESTAT. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand on different issue: Delhi High Court. *  ITC dispute involves no question of law: GSTAT directs appeal to Vice-President. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand On different issue: Delhi High Court. *  No E-way bill required for interstate goods movement in november 2017: GSTAT quashes detention and penalty.  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST update - 13.1.2017 Definition of Exempt supplies, Goods and Inputs

GST DAILY DOSE OF UPDATION
Definition of Exempt supplies, Goods and Inputs
Taking further to our discussion, we are continuing our discussion the definitions given under Section 2 of revised GST law and comparing the same with old model GST law to know the changes made in revised law:-
Section 2(42): Exempt Supplies: This has been defined to mean supply of any goods and/or services which are not taxable under this Act and includes such supply of goods and/or services which attract nil rate of tax or which may be exempt from tax under section 11.

When we compare this definition with definition in Model GST law, it can be noticed that NIL rate of tax will be classified as exempt supplies for the purpose of this act. The definition of exempt supply is also important for the purpose of allowing input tax credit. When the input tax credit is partly used for taxable supply and party for exempt supply then the credit will be restricted to so much credit as is attributable to taxable supply as per provision of Section 17(2) of Revised GST law. But inclusion of NIL rate of tax into exempt supply would mean that earlier there was an interpretation that cenvat could be allowed on such supplies but after the amendment, it is clear that nil rated supplies will be exempt supplies and as a result, so much cenvat as is attributable to such supplies shall not be allowed.

Also, the definition of "exempt supply" also include those supply which are exempted under Section 11. We see that there is no change in this regard on comparing with old GST law except earlier the Section giving exemption was Section 10 only. Even there is no major difference in wording of new and old section. However, certain points are relevant for Section 11 which are as under:-
a. The Central or State Government can issue notification to give exemption from payment of GST but it will be done on recommendation of GST council only.
b. The Central or State Government can also issue special order to give exemption from payment of GST in exceptional circumstances but it will also be issued on recommendation of GST council.
c. There is a power in Central and State Government to issue an explanation to add in this notification or order within one year to explain the scope of notification or order and this will have effect that this explanation will be part of statue from the date of notification. This can be welcome step to clarify doubts but at the same time, it can dangerous as it may create liability retrospectively. The interpretation taken by assessee on language of notification can be undone by issue of an explanation.
d. There is no need to issue notification in public gazette only but it can be effective on publication on website of the Government. This is also major change from the existing position. Even the Apex Court has held that the notification will effective from the date of issue of notification in official gazette.

1. Section 2(48) Goods: There has been substantial change in the definition of goods. The new definition reads as follows:
“Goods means every kind of movable property other than money and securities but includes actionable claim, growing crops, grass and things attached to or forming part of the land which are agreed to be severed before supply or under a contract of supply;”

The old definition read as follows:
“goods’’ means every kind of movable property other than actionable claim and money but includes securities, growing crops, grass and things attached to or forming part of the land which are agreed to be severed before supply or under the contract of supply; 
Explanation.– For the purpose of this clause, the term ‘moveable property’ shall not include any intangible property.

When both the definitions are compared, it can be noted that goods will now include actionable claim, intangible property and exclude securities. In other words Shares / debenture / Mutual Funds etc have been excluded from GST and transaction in these will not be subjected to GST. There was dispute and share market was demanding to exclude the securities from GST and it is welcome step on part of Government. Similarly actionable claim will be included in Goods instead of services. Also the explanation has been deleted under new definition giving effect that intangible property will be covered under goods now instead of services. This is done with the intention to end the ongoing dispute over the software service classification.

2. Section 2(54): Input: The new definition read as follows:
“Input means any goods other than capital goods used or intended to be used by a supplier in the course or furtherance of business;”

The old definition read as follows:
“input” means any goods other than capital goods, subject to exceptions as may be provided under this Act or the rules made thereunder, used or intended to be used by a supplier for making an outward supply in the course or furtherance of business;

The intention behind the amendment has largely been to simplify it to avoid any litigation. It can be noted that in the old law, the definition was oriented towards mandating the use of the goods for making the outward supply. In the new definition, this condition has been done away with and the only condition retained is that the inputs should be used in the furtherance of business. This will avoid litigation to a large extent where there is dispute over the use of inputs. The only fact that it has been used for the purpose of business itself will be sufficient to render it eligible for the purpose of availing cenvat.

 

You may visit us at 
www.capradeepjain.com and also at 
https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com