Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Missing seized records must be considered while testing ITC claim; duplicate GST demands ordered corrected: Delhi High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be rejected without addressing taxpayer’s grounds: Allahabad High Court. *  Surplus IGST credit can offset CGST, SGST shortfall: GSTAT. *  GST refund can’t be denied when cancelled airfares are returned with tax: GSTAT. *  3 Hearing notices issued within 2 minutes: Gujarat High Court flags portal flaw, seeks report. *  GSTR-9, GSTR-9C filing for FY 2025-26 enabled; pending GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B must be filed first. *  Dupattas are exempt fabrics, can’t be taxed as fibres at 4%: Madras High Court. *  Full transitional credit allowed on capital goods received after GST rollout: GSTAT denies Rs. 6.99 lakh export duty credit. *  GST return mismatch alone can’t justify fraud proceedings: GSTAT orders fresh adjudication under section 73. *  Supplier found non-existent later can’t alone justify input tax credit denial: GSTAT. *  GST interest stops once tax reaches government account, can’t run until return filing: GSTAT. *  Cancelled flat booking- GST refund can’t be denied without excluding COVID period from limitation: GSTAT. *  India notifies rules of origin for India–New Zealand FTA. *  Incomplete E-bike kits classifiable as complete vehicles, but not eligible for CKD duty concession: CESTAT. *  Same GST rate on main input and output can’t by itself bar inverted duty refund: GSTAT. *  Unjust enrichment doesn’t apply to customs refunds from assessments finalised before July 13, 2006: Gujarat High Court. *  CENVAT credit can’t be denied solely because plant And machinery are embedded in earth: Karnataka High Court. *  DFIA exports ineligible for RoDTEP benefits; customs directs repayment with applicable interest. *  Second E-Way bill alone doesn’t prove another supply: GSTAT. *  Bail denied in Rs. 1.19 crore fake GST refund case over risk of accused absconding again: Punjab and Haryana High Court. *  GST registration can be restored after revocation deadline if outstanding dues are paid: Gauhati High Court. *  Multiple GST proceedings over same suppliers: Calcutta High Court directs dept. to share findings for adjudication. *  E-Governance portal services not OIDAR, fixed deposit interest not taxable: CESTAT. *  Rs. 500 Stamp duty required on authority letters for CAs, CMA and GST practitioners in Pune GST division.  *  Rs. 1.10 crore GST refund must be paid in cash after business closure: Allahabad High Court. *  Godown rent attracts 18% GST even when used exclusively for exempt agricultural warehousing: AAR. *  GST portal launches "Multi-State Registration" facility: one master TRN for registration applications across multiple States/UTs. *  RoDTEP scheme extended till 31st December, 2026.  *  Mere disagreement with order can’t override Rs. 20 lakh appeal limit: GSTAT. *  Customs interest can’t be backdated before confiscation liability is determined; nearly 8 year period excluded: Delhi High Court.
Subject News *  GST summons: anticipatory bail maintainable without arrest order, but relief denied in evasion case: Allahabad High Court. *  GST Appeal can’t be decided without hearing taxpayer’s objections to fresh evidence: Allahabad High Court. *  GST ITC can’t be reversed merely because supplier grants discount without reducing tax liability: GSTAT. *  Mere quoting of GST provision is not a valid charge: GSTAT quashes ITC denial. *  Personal hearing mandatory before adverse GST order, even without taxpayer’s request: Rajasthan High Court. *  Parallel bail pleas without full disclosure amount to abuse of process Rs. 43.08 crore GST case sent for fresh hearing: Supreme Court. *  GST refund based on unchallenged advance ruling can’t be recovered using later circular: GSTAT. *  Payment of GST alone doesn’t end interest and penalty liability when tax and interest remain unpaid beyond 30 days of notice: GSTAT. *  GST demand over builders’ 80% procurement rule requires reasoned adjudication: GSTAT. *  Eligible ITC doesn’t automatically entitle taxpayers to compensation cess refund on domestic sales: GSTAT. *  GST confiscation order passed before reply deadline invalid: GSTAT. *  GST interest can’t be retained after tax refund on delayed export receipts: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be dismissed over pre-deposit shortfall without opportunity To respond: Bombay High Court. *  DGGI SCN can’t be challenged before reply and adjudication:Chhattisgarh High Court. *  GST input tax credit can’t be denied solely due to supplier’s retrospective registration cancellation: GSTAT. *  GST notice must explain fraud allegations; merely repeating section 74 Is not enough:  Himachal Pradesh High Court. *  Audit detection alone can’t justify GST fraud penalty; specific suppression must be proved: GSTAT. *  GST order uploaded only under ‘Additional Notices’ tab without separate intimation set aside: Calcutta High Court. *  Service Tax appeal can’t be rejected for missing pre-deposit proof when payment is already recorded: CESTAT. *  SGST dept. can’t hear appeal against CGST order: Calcutta High Court. *  Mere dispatch of tax order can’t prove service or make appeal time-barred: CESTAT. *  Dealer incentives can’t be taxed merely on ledger entries: CESTAT. *  DGFT orders quashed for failure to supply DRI letter relied upon in SCN: Bombay High Court. *  GST penalty u/s 122(1A) can’t apply to Pre-2021 transactions; unregistered beneficiaries also covered: Delhi High Court. *  Expired E-way bill caused by wrong PIN code can’t justify GST penalty without intent to evade tax: GSTAT. *  Used railway rails can’t be taxed as track material without proof they are fit for reuse: CESTAT. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand on different issue: Delhi High Court. *  ITC dispute involves no question of law: GSTAT directs appeal to Vice-President. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand On different issue: Delhi High Court. *  No E-way bill required for interstate goods movement in november 2017: GSTAT quashes detention and penalty.  

Comments
Print   |    |  Comment

8892 GST Update(Hindi)-06.12.2016

To view this, click here

Opinion

हमनेअभीतकपूर्तिकीतथाशिड्यूलI (schedule I) वशिड्यूलII (schedule II) में  वर्णितप्रावधानों  केबारेमेंचर्चाकीथी।अबइसकड़ीमेंSchedule III मेंहुएबदलावऔरउसकेपरिणामोकेबारेमेंविवेचनाकरेंगे।पुरानेजीएसटीड्राफ्टक़ानून  मेंschedule III मेंरजिस्टरहोनेवालेव्यक्तियोंकेबारेमेंबतायागयाथा,परंतुनएजीएसटीक़ानून  मेंउनगतिविधियों(activities) व  सौदों(transactions) केबारेमेंदर्शायाहैजोनतोगुड्स  औरनहीसर्विसकीपूर्तिहै।

1. नएजीएसटीड्राफ्टक़ानूनकीपहलीentry  मेंकर्मचारी(employee) द्वारानियोक्ता(employer) कोदी  जानेवालीसेवाओंकाउल्लेखकियागयाहै।इसकामतलबयहहैकिकर्मचारीद्वारानियोक्ताकोरोज़गारकेदौरानदीजानेवालीसेवाओंकोपूर्तिनहींमानाजाएगाऔरजीएसटीनहींलगेगा।  पुरानेजीएसटीड्राफ्टक़ानूनमेंभीसेक्शन  9  " taxable person" कीपरिभाषामेंकर्मचारीद्वारानियोक्ताकोरोज़गार  केदौरानदीगईसर्विस  कोनिकालागयाथा।  यहीनहीं, वर्तमानजीएसटीड्राफ्टक़ानूनमेंभीकर्मचारी  द्वारानियोक्ताकोदीगईसेवाओँकोनिकालागयाहै।अतःनएजीएसटीड्राफ्टक़ानूनमेंकर्मचारीद्वारानियोक्ताकोरोज़गारकेदौरानदीजानेवालीसेवाओंमेंकोईबदलावनहींकियाहै। 
2.नएजीएसटीड्राफ्टक़ानूनमेंकिसीभी  law मेंकोर्ट  तथाट्रिब्यूनल(Tribunal) द्वारादीजानेवाली  सेवाओंकोपूर्तिनहींमानाजाएगा।तथा  जीएसटीनहींलगेगा।  पुरानेजीएसटीड्राफ्टक़ानूनमेंऐसाकोईप्रावधाननहींहै।  तथापिऐसाप्रावधानवर्त्तमानservice tax law  मेंहै।वर्तमानमेंसर्विस  परिभाषामेंसेकिसीभीकानूनमेंट्रिब्यूनलअथवाकोर्टकोकोदीजानेवाली  फीस(fees) कोहटायागयाहै।  इसप्रकार, नए  जीएसटीड्राफ्टक़ानूनमेंपुरानीविसंगतिकोदूरकियागयाहै। 
3. नएजीएसटीlaw में, नई  एंट्री(entry) डालीगईहैजिसमेंनीचेदिएगएकार्यों  औरसर्विसों  कोपूर्तिनहींमानागयाहै:-
(१) संसदकेसदस्यों, राज्यविधानसभाकेसदस्यों, पंचायतकेसदस्यों, नगरपालिकाकेसदस्यों, अन्यस्थानीयप्राधिकारीकेसदस्योंद्वारादीगईसेवाएं, तथा
(२)संविधानकेप्रावधानोंकेअनुसरणमेंकिसीभीपदधारणद्वाराउसपदकीक्षमतामेंकियागयाकार्यतथा,
(३) केंद्रीयसरकार, राज्यसरकारतथा  प्राधिकारणद्वारानियुक्तअध्यक्षयासदस्ययाdirector in a body corporate द्वाराकियेगएकार्यऔरजोइसकेप्रारम्भसेपहलेएककर्मचारीकेरूपमेंसमझनहींहै। 
यथावतऊपरदीगईentry कोपुरानेड्राफ्टजीएसटीक़ानून  मेंकोईस्थानप्राप्तनहींथा।  लेकिनवर्तमान  मेंसर्विसकीपरिभाषा  मेंव्याख्यामेंभीहै।अतःयहएंट्री  पुरानेड्राफ्टजीएसटीकानूनकोसुधारतीहै। 
 
 
4 . नयेजीएसटीक़ानून  केअनुसार, विदेशीराजनयिकमिशनजोभारतमेहैकोभीपूर्तिनहीमानागयाहैतथाजीएसटीनहीलगायाजायेगाऔरपुरानेजीएसटीक़ानूनमेभीइसकाकोईप्रावधाननहीथा।वर्तमानमेभारतमेस्थितविदेशीराजनयिकमिशनकोनेगिटिवलिस्ट(negative list) मेरखाहै।
5. नयेlaw  केअनुसार, अंतिमसंस्कार, कब्रिस्तान, श्मशानकीसेवाओंयामृतककेपरिवहनसहितमुर्दाघरकीसेवाओंकोपूर्तिनहीकहागयाहैतथाजीएसटीनहीलगायाजाएगा।इससर्विस  परसर्विसटैक्स  भीनहीलगायाजाताहै।  अतःइसविसंगतिकोदूरकियागयाहै।   लेकिनपुरानेजीएसटीक़ानून  मेऐसाकुछनहीकहागयाथा।  

Post a Comment
Department News


Query
 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com